Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

In Vivo three-dimensional imaging analysis of femoral and tibial tunnel locations in single and double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Authors
Yang, J.-H.Chang, M.Kwak, D.-S.Jang, K.-M.Wang, J.H.
Issue Date
2014
Publisher
Korean Orthopaedic Association
Keywords
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Double bundle; Position; Single bundle; Tunnel
Citation
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery, v.6, no.1, pp.32 - 42
Indexed
SCOPUS
KCI
Journal Title
Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery
Volume
6
Number
1
Start Page
32
End Page
42
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/100851
DOI
10.4055/cios.2014.6.1.32
ISSN
2005-291x
Abstract
Background: Anatomic footprint restoration of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is recommended during reconstruction surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare and analyze the femoral and tibial tunnel positions of transtibial single bundle (SB) and transportal double bundle (DB) ACL reconstruction using three-dimensional computed tomography (3D-CT). Methods: In this study, 26 patients who underwent transtibial SB ACL reconstruction and 27 patients with transportal DB ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft. 3D-CTs were taken within 1 week after the operation. The obtained digital images were then imported into the commercial package Geomagic Studio v10.0. The femoral tunnel positions were evaluated using the quadrant method. The mean, standard deviation, standard error, minimum, maximum, and 95% confidence interval values were determined for each measurement. Results: The femoral tunnel for the SB technique was located 35.07% ± 5.33% in depth and 16.62% ± 4.99% in height. The anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) tunnel of DB technique was located 30.48% ± 5.02% in depth, 17.12% ± 5.84% in height and 34.76% ± 5.87% in depth, 45.55% ± 6.88% in height, respectively. The tibial tunnel with the SB technique was located 45.43% ± 4.81% from the anterior margin and 47.62% ± 2.51% from the medial tibial articular margin. The AM and PL tunnel of the DB technique was located 33.76% ± 7.83% from the anterior margin, 45.56% ± 2.71% from the medial tibial articular margin and 53.19% ± 3.74% from the anterior margin, 46.00% ± 2.48% from the medial tibial articular margin, respectively. The tibial tunnel position with the transtibial SB technique was located between the AM and PL tunnel positions formed with the transportal DB technique. Conclusions: Using the 3D-CT measuring method, the location of the tibia tunnel was between the AM and PL footprints, but the center of the femoral tunnel was at more shallow position from the AM bundle footprint when ACL reconstruction was performed by the transtibial SB technique. © 2014 by The Korean Orthopaedic Association.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Engineering > Department of Mechanical Engineering > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE