Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Can intensity-modulated radiation therapy spare the central flapped area while encompassing the target volume in radiotherapy after immediate breast reconstruction?

Authors
Lee, Jung AeYoon, Won SupChung, Se YoungYang, Dae SikLee, SukPark, Young JeKim, Chul YongSon, Gil SooYoon, Eul Sik
Issue Date
10월-2013
Publisher
WILEY
Keywords
breast cancer; breast reconstruction; intensity-modulated radiation therapy; organ at risk; target volume
Citation
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, v.57, no.5, pp.595 - 602
Indexed
SCIE
SCOPUS
Journal Title
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY
Volume
57
Number
5
Start Page
595
End Page
602
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/102035
DOI
10.1111/1754-9485.12078
ISSN
1754-9477
Abstract
IntroductionRadiotherapy increases the morbidity of immediate breast reconstruction. To spare the flapped area without an adverse dose distribution of the target volume and organ at risks, various radiation techniques were assessed. MethodsTwelve breasts undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap reconstruction were evaluated. After a delineation of whole breast, the doughnut-like breast target volume (BTV) including the chest wall and skin and the subtracted central flapped volume (FV) were defined. The opposed wedge tangential radiotherapy (3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3-D CRT)), field-in-field radiotherapy (FiF), inverse intensity-modulated radiotherapy (iIMRT), volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (VMRT) and the mixture of FiF and iIMRT (HYBRID) were tried. Total 50Gy was prescribed to the BTV. The paired student t-tests were performed. ResultsThe V-47.5Gy of the BTV was improved in iIMRT and VMRT compared with 3-D CRT and FiF. The mean FV doses in iIMRT and VMRT were 76.73.9% and 85.5 +/- 4.0%, respectively. However the mean ipsilateral lung doses were aggravated by iIMRT and VMRT. In terms of HYBRID, the V-47.5Gy for the BTV was 97.5 +/- 0.7%. The mean FV dose was 89.4 +/- 2.1%. While the mean FV dose in HYBRID was 13.7 +/- 2.1% (P<0.001) lower than FiF, it was 12.8 +/- 1.9% (P<0.001) higher than iIMRT. The mean ipsilateral lung dose in HYBRID was 2.8 +/- 1.9% (P<0.001) worse than FiF, and 2.6 +/- 1.8% (P<0.001) better than iIMRT. ConclusionsThe HYBRID could minimise the adverse dose distribution of lung and reduce 10% of the mean dose to the flapped area. For patients with adverse factors for the failure of breast reconstruction, the HYBRID could be considered.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Graduate School > Department of Biomedical Sciences > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Son, Gil Soo photo

Son, Gil Soo
의과대학 (의학과)
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE