Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

CULTURE, SELF, AND PREFERENCE STRUCTURE: TRANSITIVITY AND CONTEXT INDEPENDENCE ARE VIOLATED MORE BY INTERDEPENDENT PEOPLE

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorPark, Bo Kyung-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jong An-
dc.contributor.authorKoo, Minkyung-
dc.contributor.authorSul, Sunhae-
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Incheol-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T04:53:50Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-06T04:53:50Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-14-
dc.date.issued2013-02-
dc.identifier.issn0278-016X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/104128-
dc.description.abstractWe hypothesized that the extent to which one's preference structure is well established depends on one's cultural orientation. In Study 1, we found that Koreans' preference judgments were more likely to violate the rules of transitivity and context independence, which are the hallmarks of coherent preference structure, than were preference judgments of Americans. Study 2 established a direct link between one's self-concept and context dependency and violation of transitivity. Specifically, context dependency and violation of transitivity were more pronounced in preference judgment among interdependent people than independent people, but only for generic items. The pattern was reversed in preference judgment for brands. Implications and future research are discussed.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherGUILFORD PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.subjectCHOICE-
dc.subjectDISSONANCE-
dc.subjectINTRANSITIVITY-
dc.subjectCONSCIOUSNESS-
dc.subjectCONSISTENCY-
dc.subjectMOTIVATION-
dc.subjectAMERICANS-
dc.subjectPRODUCTS-
dc.subjectDECISION-
dc.subjectINDIANS-
dc.titleCULTURE, SELF, AND PREFERENCE STRUCTURE: TRANSITIVITY AND CONTEXT INDEPENDENCE ARE VIOLATED MORE BY INTERDEPENDENT PEOPLE-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorSul, Sunhae-
dc.identifier.doi10.1521/soco.2013.31.1.106-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84879756437-
dc.identifier.wosid000315676200008-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationSOCIAL COGNITION, v.31, no.1, pp.106 - 118-
dc.relation.isPartOfSOCIAL COGNITION-
dc.citation.titleSOCIAL COGNITION-
dc.citation.volume31-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage106-
dc.citation.endPage118-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPsychology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPsychology, Social-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCHOICE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDISSONANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINTRANSITIVITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONSCIOUSNESS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCONSISTENCY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMOTIVATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusAMERICANS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPRODUCTS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDECISION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINDIANS-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of Psychology > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE