Retrograde Versus Antegrade Nerve Sparing During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Is Better for Achieving Early Functional Recovery?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ko, Young Hwii | - |
dc.contributor.author | Coelho, Rafael F. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Sivaraman, Ananthakrishnan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Schatloff, Oscar | - |
dc.contributor.author | Chauhan, Sanket | - |
dc.contributor.author | Abdul-Muhsin, Haidar M. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Carrion, Rair Jose Valero | - |
dc.contributor.author | Palmer, Kenneth J. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Cheon, Jun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Patel, Vipul R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T05:56:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T05:56:26Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0302-2838 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/104399 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Although the retrograde approach to nerve sparing (NS) aimed at maximizing NS during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been described, its significant benefits compared to the antegrade approach have not yet been investigated. Objective: To evaluate the impact of NS approaches on perioperative, pathologic, and functional outcomes. Design, setting, and participants: Five hundred one potent (Sexual Health Inventory for Men [SHIM] score >21) men underwent bilateral full NS and were followed up for a minimum of 1 yr. After propensity score matching, 344 patients were selected and were then categorized into two groups. Surgical procedure: RARP with antegrade NS (n = 172) or RARP with retrograde NS (n = 172). Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Functional outcomes were assessed using validated questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression models were applied. Results and limitations: Positive margin rates were similar (11.1% vs 6.9%; p = 0.192), and no correlation with the NS approach was found on regression analysis. At 3, 6, and 9 mo, the potency rate was significantly higher in the retrograde approach (65% vs 80.8% and 72.1% vs 90.1% and 85.3% vs 92.9%, respectively). The multivariable model indicated that the NS approach was an independent predictor for potency recovery at 3, 6, and 9 mo, along with age, gland size, and hyperlipidemia. After adjusting for these predictors, the hazard ratio (HR) for the retrograde relative to the antegrade approach was 2.462 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.482-4.089; p = 0.001) at 3, 4.024 (95% CI, 2.171-7.457; p < 0.001) at 6, and 2.145 (95% CI, 1.019-4.514; p = 0.044) at 9 mo. Regarding continence, the recovery rates at each time point and the mean time to regaining it were similar, and the method of NS had no effect on multivariable analysis. The absence of randomization is a major limitation of this study. Conclusions: In patients with normal erectile function who underwent bilateral full NS, a retrograde NS approach facilitated early recovery of potency compared to that with an antegrade NS approach without compromising cancer control. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of European Association of Urology. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | - |
dc.subject | SEXUAL FUNCTION | - |
dc.subject | PRESERVATION | - |
dc.subject | CONTINENCE | - |
dc.subject | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject | QUALITY | - |
dc.subject | FASCIA | - |
dc.title | Retrograde Versus Antegrade Nerve Sparing During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Is Better for Achieving Early Functional Recovery? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Cheon, Jun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.09.051 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84870569841 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000312004100031 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | EUROPEAN UROLOGY, v.63, no.1, pp.169 - 177 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | EUROPEAN UROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.title | EUROPEAN UROLOGY | - |
dc.citation.volume | 63 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 169 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 177 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Urology & Nephrology | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SEXUAL FUNCTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PRESERVATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONTINENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | OUTCOMES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | QUALITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FASCIA | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Nerve sparing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Robot assisted radical prostatectomy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Erectile dysfunction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Incontinence | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.