COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE SHIP-TO-YARD VEHICLES WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF THE BATCH PROCESS OF QUAY CRANES
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Choi, S. H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Won, S. H. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, C. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T11:15:49Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T11:15:49Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1072-4761 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/106432 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Container terminals around the world fiercely compete to increase their throughput and to accommodate new mega vessels. In order to increase the port throughput drastically, new quay cranes capable of batch processing are being introduced. The tandem-lift spreader equipped with a quay crane, which can handle one to four containers simultaneously, has recently been developed. Such increase in the handling capacity of quay cranes requires significant increase in the transportation capacity of ship-to-yard vehicles as well. The objective of this study is to compare the performances of three alternative configurations of ship-to-yard vehicles in a conventional container terminal environment. We assume that the yard storage for containers is horizontally configured and the quay cranes equip with tandem-lift spreaders. A discrete event simulation model for a container terminal is developed and validated. We compare the performances of the three alternatives under different cargo workloads and profiles, represented by different annual container handling volumes and different ratios of tandem mode operations, respectively. The results show that the performances of the alternative vehicle types are largely dependent on workload requirement and profile. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | UNIV CINCINNATI INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING | - |
dc.subject | SEAPORT CONTAINER TERMINALS | - |
dc.subject | TRANSPORT | - |
dc.subject | AGVS | - |
dc.title | COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVE SHIP-TO-YARD VEHICLES WITH THE CONSIDERATION OF THE BATCH PROCESS OF QUAY CRANES | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, C. | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000317218700009 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, v.20, no.1-2, pp.84 - 98 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE | - |
dc.citation.title | INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1-2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 84 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 98 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Industrial | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Manufacturing | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SEAPORT CONTAINER TERMINALS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TRANSPORT | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | AGVS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ship-to-yard vehicle | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | simulation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | container terminal | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | quay crane | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | tandem-lift spreader | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.