Biaxial flexural strength of concrete by two different methods
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jihwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Chongku | - |
dc.contributor.author | Zi, Goangseup | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T12:54:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T12:54:35Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-12 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0024-9831 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/106895 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The biaxial flexural strength of a concrete panel can be evaluated by two different methods: the centrally loaded round panel test (ASTM C 1150) and the recently proposed biaxial flexure test (BFT). Twenty-six tests, with 13 specimens for each test method, were performed to verify the effect of the different test methods on the biaxial flexural strength of concrete. A finite-element analysis of the specimens of two test methods showed that the biaxial flexure test set-up allows a larger area with a uniform biaxial stress on the bottom surface around the centre of the specimen than the ASTM C 1550 set-up, indicating that the difference in the test results is attributable to the volume effects. The test results showed that the biaxial flexure test method gives a more reliable biaxial flexural strength with a 25% lower coefficient of variation than that from the ASTM C 1550. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ICE PUBLISHING | - |
dc.subject | TENSILE TEST METHOD | - |
dc.subject | BEHAVIOR | - |
dc.subject | STRESS | - |
dc.title | Biaxial flexural strength of concrete by two different methods | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yi, Chongku | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Zi, Goangseup | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1680/macr.11.00178 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84870891215 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000310838200002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH, v.64, no.12, pp.1057 - 1065 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.title | MAGAZINE OF CONCRETE RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 64 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1057 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1065 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Construction & Building Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Materials Science | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Construction & Building Technology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Materials Science, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TENSILE TEST METHOD | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BEHAVIOR | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STRESS | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.