Comparison and correction of the drop breakup models for stochastic dilute spray flow
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Min Wool | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jung Jae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Farid, Massoud Massoudi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoon, Sam S. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T15:55:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T15:55:54Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-09 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0307-904X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/107523 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Spray-gas interaction is common in many industrial applications that use a liquid jet injection system. Numerous liquid drops interact with the surrounding gas as they travel through the air. During such a travel, aerodynamic interaction between a drop and the surrounding gas flattens the drop and ultimately, breaks up the drop. The TAB (Taylor Analogy Breakup) model was proposed by O'Rourke and Amsden (1987) [6] for the KIVA spray code, but the use of this model has been controversial because the original paper that proposed this model has typographical errors. Another well-known drop breakup model, such as the DDB (Drop Deformation Breakup) model of Ibrahim et al. (1993) [8], has been widely used. However, although numerical solutions of the DDB model ostensibly make it appear superior to those of other previous breakup models, they contain errors that need to be amended. This paper aims to clarify the error controversies of both models: the typographical errors and the erroneous numerical solutions. The complete mathematical derivation of the TAB model is presented, and its correct numerical solutions are compared against the experimental data. We found that the TAB model was superior to other breakup models, such as Clark (1988) [7] and DDB. (C) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC | - |
dc.subject | DEFORMATION | - |
dc.subject | SIMULATION | - |
dc.subject | ATOMIZATION | - |
dc.subject | DYNAMICS | - |
dc.title | Comparison and correction of the drop breakup models for stochastic dilute spray flow | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yoon, Sam S. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.apm.2012.02.015 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84862780439 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000305303800043 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, v.36, no.9, pp.4512 - 4520 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING | - |
dc.citation.title | APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 36 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 4512 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 4520 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mathematics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mechanics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Multidisciplinary | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Mechanics | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DEFORMATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SIMULATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ATOMIZATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DYNAMICS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Drop | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Aerodynamic drag | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Breakup model | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Secondary atomization | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.