Errors in Thickness Comparison Maps From 3D Optical Coherence Tomography
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Park, Jin-Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Oh, Jaeryung | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yang, Kyung-Sook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seong-Woo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Huh, Kuhl | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T18:07:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T18:07:18Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-07 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1542-8877 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/108041 | - |
dc.description.abstract | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To study characteristics of errors in thickness comparison maps (TCMs) from three-dimensional optical coherence tomography. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent three-dimensional optical coherence tomography examinations were included. Errors in TCM were categorized into several types according to common features, and the origins and distributions of errors were investigated. RESULTS: Errors were observed in 25 (22.9%) of 109 TCMs with a normal macula and in 88 (63.3%) of 139 TCMs with an abnormal macula (P < .001). The errors were categorized into three types: horizontal line-shaped errors that originated from fixation loss by the examinee, jumping errors caused by segmentation error, and two-peaked errors due to mismatching. There were significant differences in the distributions of the error types among different diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Errors in TCM were categorized into several types according to common features. Distributions of these types differed among eyes according to diagnosis. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2012;43:275-283.] | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SLACK INC | - |
dc.subject | DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA | - |
dc.subject | RETINAL THICKNESS | - |
dc.subject | PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY | - |
dc.subject | DEGENERATION | - |
dc.subject | HEALTHY | - |
dc.subject | DOMAIN | - |
dc.subject | REPRODUCIBILITY | - |
dc.subject | INSTRUMENTS | - |
dc.subject | RETINOPATHY | - |
dc.subject | STRATUS | - |
dc.title | Errors in Thickness Comparison Maps From 3D Optical Coherence Tomography | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Oh, Jaeryung | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yang, Kyung-Sook | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Seong-Woo | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Huh, Kuhl | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3928/15428877-20120618-05 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84866769817 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000312366000002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING, v.43, no.4, pp.275 - 283 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING | - |
dc.citation.title | OPHTHALMIC SURGERY LASERS & IMAGING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 43 | - |
dc.citation.number | 4 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 275 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 283 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article; Proceedings Paper | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Ophthalmology | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Surgery | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Ophthalmology | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Surgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DIABETIC MACULAR EDEMA | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETINAL THICKNESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DEGENERATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | HEALTHY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DOMAIN | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | REPRODUCIBILITY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INSTRUMENTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETINOPATHY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STRATUS | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.