Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Process attribute rating and sensitivity analysis in process assessment

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ho-Won-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-06T18:57:38Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-06T18:57:38Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2012-06-
dc.identifier.issn2047-7481-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/108192-
dc.description.abstractThe capability level of a process assessed on the basis of International Standard ISO/IEC 15504 is determined by utilizing process attributes ratings (PAs). PA rating as a composite indicator is determined by the extent to which outcomes or the implemented practices are achieved. However, the ISO/IEC 15504 standards do not provide recommendations as to assessment methods, including the following: (i) which of the outcomes or practices implemented are evaluated as an intermediate step in rating the PA; and (ii) how a set of their achievements is aggregated into the PA rating. This study addresses a simple additive weighting method based on the performance value and weights of practices implemented as well as its rationale, in order to facilitate consistent and repeatable PA ratings. Then, sensitivity analysis is conducted to evaluate how much a change in the weight or performance value of an implemented practice will affect and alter the current PA rating. Our sensitivity analysis can be employed in cases in which an assessor must explain his/her ratings to assessment team members, as well as the organizational unit assessed. Six examples are provided to illustrate the applications of our sensitivity analyses. Copyright (C) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.subjectCOMPOSITE INDICATORS-
dc.subjectDECISION-
dc.subjectMISSPECIFICATION-
dc.subjectMODELS-
dc.titleProcess attribute rating and sensitivity analysis in process assessment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorJung, Ho-Won-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smr.545-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84863335877-
dc.identifier.wosid000305580700002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, v.24, no.4, pp.401 - 419-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS-
dc.citation.volume24-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage401-
dc.citation.endPage419-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaComputer Science-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryComputer Science, Software Engineering-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMPOSITE INDICATORS-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDECISION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMISSPECIFICATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMODELS-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcriticality degree-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorISO/IEC 15504-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormultiple criteria analysis-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorprocess attribute-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsensitivity analysis-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Korea University Business School > Department of Business Administration > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE