Evaluating asset pricing models in the Korean stock market
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Soon-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dongcheol | - |
dc.contributor.author | Shin, Hyun-Soo | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-06T21:42:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-06T21:42:38Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-18 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0927-538X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/108815 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper evaluates and compares asset pricing models in the Korean stock market. The asset pricing models considered are the CAPM. APT-motivated models, the Consumption-based CAPM, Intertemporal CAPM-motivated models, and the Jagannathan and Wang conditional CAPM model. By using various test portfolios as well as individual stocks, we conduct time-series tests and cross-sectional regression tests based on individual t-tests, the joint F-tests, the Hansen and Jagannathan (1997) distance, and R-squares. Overall, the Fama and French (1993) five-factor model performs most satisfactorily among the asset pricing models considered in explaining the intertemporal and cross-sectional behavior of stock returns in Korea. The Fama and French (1993) three-factor model, the Chen et al. (2010) three-factor model, and the Campbell (1996) model are the next. The results indicate that the two bond portfolios, term spread and default spread, play an important role in explaining stock returns in Korea. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER | - |
dc.subject | INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY RISK | - |
dc.subject | CROSS-SECTION | - |
dc.subject | RETURNS | - |
dc.subject | GROWTH | - |
dc.subject | EQUILIBRIUM | - |
dc.subject | CONSUMPTION | - |
dc.subject | VALUATION | - |
dc.subject | ANOMALIES | - |
dc.subject | SELECTION | - |
dc.subject | ERRORS | - |
dc.title | Evaluating asset pricing models in the Korean stock market | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Dongcheol | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.pacfin.2011.09.001 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-80053519837 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000299978200002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL, v.20, no.2, pp.198 - 227 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL | - |
dc.citation.title | PACIFIC-BASIN FINANCE JOURNAL | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 198 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 227 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Business, Finance | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | INFORMATION UNCERTAINTY RISK | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CROSS-SECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RETURNS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | GROWTH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EQUILIBRIUM | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CONSUMPTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VALUATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANOMALIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | SELECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ERRORS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pricing performance | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Asset pricing models | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | CAPM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | APT | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Consumption-based CAPM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Intertemporal CAPM | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Korean stock markets | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.