Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Perception of English Vowel Categories by Korean University Students

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author황인자-
dc.contributor.author이신숙-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T00:45:33Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T00:45:33Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn1229-4039-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/109589-
dc.description.abstractThe paper examined Korean university students' perception of English vowel categories /ɪ/, /ɛ/, /æ/, /ʌ/, and /ɔ/ using English minimal pairs designed for the study. Thirty female freshmen recruited from a university in Seoul took part in the discrimination and identification tests. The results showed that most students did not have much difficulty discriminating the vowel contrasts between /ɪ/ & /ɛ/, /ɛ/ & /æ/, and /ʌ/ & /ɔ/. However, they had a great difficulty identifying target vowel categories in the identification test, although students in the high-proficiency group outperformed those in the low-proficiency group. The overall results indicated that the students' perception of English vowel categories was affected by task types, students' L1 vowel categories, and their English proficiency. However, the results of the experiments showed that the students' familiarity with the target words was not correlated with their perceptual accuracy. The findings of the study were further discussed in terms of task effects, vowel category variance, error patterns, EFL learners' phonetic category representation, and L2 speech perception models.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher한국언어학회-
dc.titlePerception of English Vowel Categories by Korean University Students-
dc.title.alternativePerception of English Vowel Categories by Korean University Students-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이신숙-
dc.identifier.doi10.18855/lisoko.2012.37.4.014-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation언어, v.37, no.4, pp.1095 - 1117-
dc.relation.isPartOf언어-
dc.citation.title언어-
dc.citation.volume37-
dc.citation.number4-
dc.citation.startPage1095-
dc.citation.endPage1117-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001723345-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEnglish vowel perception-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEFL settings-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordiscrimination-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoridentification-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorL1 transfer-
dc.subject.keywordAuthortask effects-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorvowel category variance-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorphonetic representation-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorEnglish proficiency-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorL2 speech perception models-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Education > Department of English Language Education > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE