스카클리닉-씬™과 스카클리닉™의 반흔 개선효과 및 편리성 비교 -예비보고-
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이상균 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 한승규 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김우경 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T01:46:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T01:46:02Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 2234-0831 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/109895 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Silicone gel sheets are widely used to treat keloids and hypertrophic scars. ScarclinicTM is a type of silicone gel sheet developed in Korea, and has been shown to improve the appearance of scars. However, ScarclinicTM has demerits that include weak adhesiveness, a color that differs from skin,and too great a thickness. Scarclinic-thinTM was recently developed with these disadvantages in mind. The purpose of this pilot study was to compare the effects of Scarclinic-thinTM and ScarclinicTM on scar appearance and wearer’s comfort. From April 2010 to May 2010, Scarclinic-thinTM and ScarclinicTM were applied to treat a single scar in each of 8 patients. One half of each scar was treated with Scarclinic-thinTM and the other with ScarclinicTM. After 3 months, scar quality and wearer’s comfort were evaluated using the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and an objective self-assessment scale (OSAS). Mean Vancouver Scar Scale scores for ScarclinicTM and Scarclinic-thinTM at 3 months were 3.4 ± 1.3 and 3.3 ± 2.0, respectively, and mean objective self-assessment scale scores were 21.7 ±4.5 and 22.3 ± 2.9, respectively. No statistically significant difference was observed between ScarclinicTM and Scarclinic-thinTM in terms of Vancouver Scar Scale or objective self-assessment scale scores (p=0.83 and 0.70, respectively). Scarclinic-thinTM and ScarclinicTM are similar in terms of their scar improving effects and wearer’s comfort. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 대한미용성형외과학회 | - |
dc.title | 스카클리닉-씬™과 스카클리닉™의 반흔 개선효과 및 편리성 비교 -예비보고- | - |
dc.title.alternative | Comparison of Scarclinic-thin™ and Scarclinic™ in terms of scar improvemen - A pilot study - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 한승규 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, v.18, no.1, pp.51 - 56 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | - |
dc.citation.title | Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery | - |
dc.citation.volume | 18 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 51 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 56 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001639520 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Scar | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Silicones | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Silicone gels | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.