호주 쇠고기 산업의 생산주의, 문화, 그리고 지속가능성
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Carol Richards | - |
dc.contributor.author | Geoffrey Lawrence | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김철규 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T02:48:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T02:48:10Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-3072 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/110212 | - |
dc.description.abstract | South Korea imports a significant amount of Australian beef and Korean consumers, in general, have trust in the quality of Australian beef, especially vis-à-vis US beef. While Korean consumers do not know exactly how Australian beef is produced, they consider Australian beef is ‘clean and green,’ in part due to aggressive promotional activities by Meat & Livestock Australia. Koreans tend to think that Australian cattle are raised on nutritious and unpolluted grasslands under environmentally sustainable conditions, which reinforces their trust in the safety of Australian beef. This paper shows that, contrary to Korean consumers’ taken-for-granted expectation, the Australian beef industry is heavily influenced by productivism which emphasizes maximization of profit and market competitiveness, often at the expense of environmental sustainability. The full picture of Australian beef industry is complicated as diverse actors such as graziers, organisations like Meat & Livestock Australia, along with green groups,have different views and interpretations of the meaning of sustainability. Following in-depth interviews with graziers (beef producers) in Central Queensland, we argue that natural resource management practices in the Australian beef industry are driven by a complex interaction of cultural norms and the global political economy. Although many contest the environmental sustainability of the cattle industry, the productivist ethos is deeply embedded – to the extent that producers often equate sustainability with economic viability. Indeed, there were very few in the study who accepted that Australian beef production practices compromised the natural environment. While there is a challenge ‘from without’ by environmentalists and even Asian consumers to a lesser degree, defense ‘from within’ by graziers, who maintain that their current beef production methods are sustainable, is quite robust. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국환경사회학회 | - |
dc.title | 호주 쇠고기 산업의 생산주의, 문화, 그리고 지속가능성 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Productivism, Culture and the Challenges of Sustainable Beef Production in Australia | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김철규 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ECO, v.16, no.1, pp.101 - 128 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ECO | - |
dc.citation.title | ECO | - |
dc.citation.volume | 16 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 101 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 128 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001677450 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 호주 쇠고기 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 청정우 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 호주 축산농가 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 생산주의 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 축산문화 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 지속가능성 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Australian beef | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | clean and green | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Australian graziers | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | productivism | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | pastoral culture | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | sustainability | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | beef consumption in Korea | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.