Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Optimal stimulation site for deep peroneal motor nerve conduction study around the ankle: Cadaveric study

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, K.H.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, D.H.-
dc.contributor.authorYun, H.S.-
dc.contributor.authorPark, B.K.-
dc.contributor.authorJang, J.E.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T04:05:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T04:05:34Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.issn2234-0645-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/110622-
dc.description.abstractObjective: To identify the optimal distal stimulation point for conventional deep peroneal motor nerve (DPN) conduction studies by a cadaveric dissection study. Method: DPN was examined in 30 ankles from 20 cadavers. The distance from the DPN to the tibialis anterior (TA) tendon was estimated at a point 8 cm proximal to the extensor digitorum brevis (EDB) muscle. Relationships between the DPN and tendons including TA, extensor hallucis longus (EHL), and extensor digitorum longus (EDL) tendons were established. Results: The median distance from the DPN to the TA tendon in all 30 cadaver ankles was 10 mm (range, 1-21 mm) at a point 8 cm proximal to the EDB muscle. The DPN was situated between EHL and EDL tendons in 18 cases (60%), between TA and EHL tendons in nine cases (30%), and lateral to the EDL tendon in three cases (10%). Conclusion: The optimal distal stimulation point for the DPN conduction study was approximately 1 cm lateral to the TA tendon at the level of 8 cm proximal to the active electrode. The distal stimulation site for the DPN should be reconsidered in cases with a weaker distal response but without an accessory peroneal nerve. © 2012 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.titleOptimal stimulation site for deep peroneal motor nerve conduction study around the ankle: Cadaveric study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, D.H.-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorPark, B.K.-
dc.identifier.doi10.5535/arm.2012.36.2.182-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84862014013-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine, v.36, no.2, pp.182 - 186-
dc.relation.isPartOfAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine-
dc.citation.titleAnnals of Rehabilitation Medicine-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage182-
dc.citation.endPage186-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.identifier.kciidART001657082-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCadaver-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorNerve conduction-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorPeroneal nerve-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorStimulation-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE