Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The R&D and productivity relationship of Korean listed firms

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorHeshmati, Almas-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Hyesung-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T07:58:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T07:58:13Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-18-
dc.date.issued2011-10-
dc.identifier.issn0895-562X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/111513-
dc.description.abstractThis study analyzes the relationship between R&D investment and the productivity of Korean R&D-engaged firms. An interdependent chain of equations including the propensity to invest, R&D investment and productivity are estimated in a multi-step procedure accounting for selectivity and simultaneity biases. Using Korean firm level panel data of listed firms from 1986 to 2002, we find four main empirical results. First, there is a two-way causal relationship between R&D investment and productivity for Korean listed firms. Second, Chaebol firms were associated with lower R&D growth as well as lower labor productivity growth in comparison to non-Chaebol firms. Third, there was a substantial reduction in growth rates both in R&D investment and labor productivity in 1997-1998, immediately following the Asian financial crisis. Fourth, considering the positive feedback effect from productivity growth to R&D growth, a decrease in R&D investment growth after the Asian financial crisis should have been harmful by further decreasing productivity growth.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSPRINGER-
dc.subjectLEVEL-
dc.subjectPERFORMANCE-
dc.subjectINNOVATION-
dc.subjectEFFICIENCY-
dc.subjectGROWTH-
dc.subjectSIZE-
dc.titleThe R&D and productivity relationship of Korean listed firms-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorHeshmati, Almas-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11123-010-0206-y-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-80052345263-
dc.identifier.wosid000294710400002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, v.36, no.2, pp.125 - 142-
dc.relation.isPartOfJOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS-
dc.citation.titleJOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS-
dc.citation.volume36-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage125-
dc.citation.endPage142-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaBusiness & Economics-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaMathematical Methods In Social Sciences-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryBusiness-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryEconomics-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategorySocial Sciences, Mathematical Methods-
dc.subject.keywordPlusLEVEL-
dc.subject.keywordPlusPERFORMANCE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusINNOVATION-
dc.subject.keywordPlusEFFICIENCY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGROWTH-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSIZE-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorR&amp-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorD investment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorProductivity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSelectivity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorChaebol-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorSimultaneity-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAsian financial crisis-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Life Sciences and Biotechnology > Department of Food and Resource Economics > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE