Remarks on Richards (2010): Are They Distinct Enough?
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김랑혜윤 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T17:57:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T17:57:58Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-6048 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/113813 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There are a number of phenomena in languages that prohibit multiple elements of the 'same type' that are 'too close together'. To explain these phenomena, Richards (2010) proposes the general principle of Distinctness. Although this principle nicely captures the facts in English multiple sluicing, the multiple remnants in Japanese sluicing remain to be explained. Thus, Richards (2010) suggests to parameterize the functional features available before linearization to capture the variation between English and Japanese. However, despite his principle and parameter, the multiple Case constructions in Korean/Japanese still pose problems to Richards (2010). I have shown in this paper that Richards need to parameterize the functional category set for nominals to capture the whole data in Korean/ Japanese. Specifically, I have suggested that the variation between English and these languages can be captured under the hypothesis that nominals in these languages are NPs rather than DPs and that the variation between Korean and Japanese can be captured by assuming that Accusative nominals in Korean can choose not to project K(ase)P over NP, while they always project KP in Japanese, resulting in the Double-o constraint effect. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국생성문법학회 | - |
dc.title | Remarks on Richards (2010): Are They Distinct Enough? | - |
dc.title.alternative | Remarks on Richards (2010): Are They Distinct Enough? | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김랑혜윤 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15860/sigg.21.2.201105.237 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 생성문법연구, v.21, no.2, pp.237 - 253 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.title | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 237 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 253 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001555760 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Distinctness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | multiple sluicing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | multiple Case | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | parameter | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | nominal functional category. | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.