Do We Have Two Different Allows? - on animacy induced variations with allow
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 손근원 | - |
dc.contributor.author | 김정석 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T18:00:42Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T18:00:42Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1225-6048 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/113830 | - |
dc.description.abstract | When allow takes an infinitival complement, there is always a noun phrase preceding the to-infinitive clause. Many people implicitly assume that allow behaves like persuade when it takes an infinitival complement,interpreting this postverbal noun phrase as the affected theme of the main verb allow, just as the noun phrase following persuade is interpreted as the target of persuasion. But Aarts (2001) provides interesting evidence showing that allow is different from persuade and concludes that allow is actually more like believe than persuade. This squib shows that Aarts is only partially right and allow can take double complement structures (like persuade) as well as single complement structures (like want or believe) depending on the nature of the postverbal noun phrase. More precisely, it will be proposed that when the noun phrase is [+animate], allow can take either the double or single complement structure but when the noun phrase is [-animate], it can take only a single complement structure. Also discussed are the exact nature of this single complement structure and a potential problem residing in the proposed analysis. Keywords: infinitival | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | 한국생성문법학회 | - |
dc.title | Do We Have Two Different Allows? - on animacy induced variations with allow | - |
dc.title.alternative | Do We Have Two Different Allows? - on animacy induced variations with allow | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김정석 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15860/sigg.21.1.201102.185 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 생성문법연구, v.21, no.1, pp.185 - 199 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.title | 생성문법연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 185 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 199 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001528749 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | infinitival complements | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | allow | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | double/single complement | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | theme | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | animacy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | raising | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.