Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

경영권 방어와 비례의 원칙 -대판 2009.1.30. 2008다50776 판결의 평석을 겸하여-

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김정호-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T18:58:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T18:58:07Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn1229-3261-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/114166-
dc.description.abstractThe principle of proportionality, or simply 'the proportionality test', originates itself from public law in Korea. The principle has especially established its strong root in the field of balancing the interest of entire community - the state or public self-governing entity - with that of individual citizens. Concretely speaking, the principle of proportionality essentially consists of the following four elements. The first element is the legitimacy of the end. This requires that aimed for the end in engaging of particular state action by the state must be legitimated. The second is the appropriateness of the means. It signifies the suitability of the tools chosen by the state for realizing the end. The third is the minimal of the infringement. It is the requirement of the least restrictive means. The final element is the proportionality of legal interests, which represents that there must be proportionally great public interest created by the subject state action for it to restrict on a person's basic rights without violating the constitution. Nowadays in Korea, it seems like to be normal or prevalent that this principle would partly be introduced to the private law, particularly to the corporate law. In addition, Melvin Eisenberg expressed simply, “the corporate law is constitutional law.” Through this passage, he tried to emphasize the common phenomenon - conflict of interest between the entire entity and its individual members - observed between the both law sectors. In the hostile take-over action, the targeted boardroom would defend the status quo only in the frame of this principle.-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher한국경영법률학회-
dc.title경영권 방어와 비례의 원칙 -대판 2009.1.30. 2008다50776 판결의 평석을 겸하여--
dc.title.alternativeThe Principle of Proportionality and The Defense against a Hostile Take-Over Action-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김정호-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation경영법률, v.21, no.3, pp.1 - 36-
dc.relation.isPartOf경영법률-
dc.citation.title경영법률-
dc.citation.volume21-
dc.citation.number3-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage36-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001552122-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor비례의 원칙(The Principle of Proportionality)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor포이즌필(Poison Pill)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor유노칼사건(Unocal Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor불독소스사건(Bulldog Sauce Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor에어가스사건(Airgas Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor현대엘리베이터사건(Hyundai Elevator Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor목적의 정당성(Legitimacy of the Ends)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor수단의 적합성(The Suitability of the Means)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor침해의 최소성(Requirement of Least Restrictive Means)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor법익의 균형성(Proportionality in the Strict Sense)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor비례의 원칙(The Principle of Proportionality)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor포이즌필(Poison Pill)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor유노칼사건(Unocal Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor불독소스사건(Bulldog Sauce Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor에어가스사건(Airgas Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor현대엘리베이터사건(Hyundai Elevator Case)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor목적의 정당성(Legitimacy of the Ends)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor수단의 적합성(The Suitability of the Means)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor침해의 최소성(Requirement of Least Restrictive Means)-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor법익의 균형성(Proportionality in the Strict Sense)-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > School of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE