Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author김경욱-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-07T19:23:51Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-07T19:23:51Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-17-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.issn1226-7686-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/114333-
dc.description.abstractIn the reorganization procedure, various classes of stakeholders participate. The law helps them make a group decision by classifying them into secured creditors, unsecured creditors, shareholders and interest holders and requiring a vote by each class on the reorganization plan (Article 236). The adoption of the reorganization plan requires the affirmative vote by all classes. However,even if the affirmative vote in one or more classes is less than the legal threshold for approval, the court is allowed to approve the reorganization plan (Article 244). This measure is called cramdown. It is intended to promote the efficient reorganization of a debtor and the protection of the rights of the stakeholders in a non-approving class on the basis that it is not socio-economically desirable to prevent a reorganization procedure for a debtor that deserves the reorganization only because of unreasonable demands by certain stakeholders. In this paper, the focus is on the detailed review of the contents and the meanings of the laws relating to the legal requirements and specific processes for the cramdown. In Chapter 2, the specific legal requirements for the courts to set forth the protection conditions and cram down the plan are reviewed in detail. Also included in this review is the general requirements for the approval of the reorganization plan as a part of such specific legal requirements. In Chapter 3, the procedures to set forth the protection conditions are divided into making the protection conditions before and after the plan is disapproved and the legal implications in each case are analyzed. Through this analysis, it is attempted to set forth the reasonable basis for understanding fairness and equity, relative priority rule and absolute priority rule, best interest of creditors principle, etc.-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher한국민사소송법학회-
dc.title회생절차에 있어서 강제인가의 요건과 그 방법-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor김경욱-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation민사소송, v.15, no.2, pp.453 - 493-
dc.relation.isPartOf민사소송-
dc.citation.title민사소송-
dc.citation.volume15-
dc.citation.number2-
dc.citation.startPage453-
dc.citation.endPage493-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001604223-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor강제인가-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor회생절차-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor회생계획-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor공정과 형평-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor절대우선설-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor상대우선설-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor계획의 수행가능성-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor부당한 차별-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor회생계획의 인가-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor청산가치보장의 원칙-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorCramdown-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorReorganization Procedure-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorReorganization Plan-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFair and Equitable-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorAbsolute Priority Theory-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRelative Priority Theory-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorFeasibility of Plan-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorUnfair Discrimination-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorConfirmation of Plan-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorBest Interest of Creditors Principle-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
Graduate School > School of Law > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher KIM, KYENG WOOK photo

KIM, KYENG WOOK
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE