Globalization and national responses: The case of korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, S. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T20:22:47Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T20:22:47Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-4659 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/114619 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this paper, I first present a definition of globalization focused on deepened international interdependence, proliferation of relevant actors, and increased complexity of issues and problems, which all demands more effective multisectoral, collaborative problem-solving. Drawing on the existing literature on the nature and impact of globalization, I develop a typology of national responses to globalization. Using the typology, I examine the case of Korea and observe that successive Korean governments over the past few decades have all pursued a “bandwagoning” strategy, putting too much emphasis on accepting and adapting to neoliberal globalization. Considering that neoliberal globalization represents only one type of globalization, I suggest that Korea needs to pursue a more flexible national strategy to deal with multiple types of globalization. Flexibilization of Korea’s globalization strategy should begin with a careful examination of other countries’ strategies and a thorough assessment of those conditions that could enable Korea to utilize a transformative globalization strategy in alliance with other actors in global governance. © 2011 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | Globalization and national responses: The case of korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, S. | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/12264431.2011.10805201 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84865107943 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | International Review of Public Administration, v.16, no.2, pp.165 - 179 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | International Review of Public Administration | - |
dc.citation.title | International Review of Public Administration | - |
dc.citation.volume | 16 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 165 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 179 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001583016 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Globalization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Multisectoral collaboration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | National strategy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Neoliberalism | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.