Which Patients Benefit from Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Intermediate Staged Rectal Cancer?
- Authors
- Yoon, Won Sup; Park, Won; Choi, Doo Ho; Ahn, Yong Chan; Chun, Ho Kyung; Lee, Woo Yong; Yun, Seong Hyeon; Kim, Hee Cheol; Cho, Yong Beom; Kang, Won Ki; Park, Young Suk; Park, Joon Oh; Lim, Ho-Yeong; Park, Se Hoon; Lee, Jeeyun
- Issue Date
- 2011
- Publisher
- KARGER
- Keywords
- Rectal cancer; Preoperative chemoradiotherapy; Postoperative chemoradiotherapy
- Citation
- ONKOLOGIE, v.34, no.1-2, pp 36 - 41
- Pages
- 6
- Indexed
- SCI
SCIE
SCOPUS
- Journal Title
- ONKOLOGIE
- Volume
- 34
- Number
- 1-2
- Start Page
- 36
- End Page
- 41
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/115054
- DOI
- 10.1159/000323382
- ISSN
- 0378-584X
1423-0240
- Abstract
- Background: The aim of this study was to identify subgroups that benefit from preoperative or postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for rectal cancer of intermediate stage. Patients and Methods: Between 1999 and 2004, 118 and 177 patients matched with respect to clinical T stage, circumferential tumor extent (<= 60% / > 60%), lymph node metastasis, and lymph node size (< 1 cm / >= 1 cm), were allocated to preoperative CRT and postoperative CRT, respectively. In preoperative CRT, a total of 45 Gy was delivered with chemotherapy, and then surgery followed. In postoperative CRT, 45-51 Gy was delivered with chemotherapy following primary surgery. Results: Local recurrence, distant metastasis, disease-free survival, and disease-specific survival were not different between the two schemes. For a circumferential tumor extent of <= 60%, local recurrence in preoperative CRT (3.6%) was lower than in postoperative CRT (11.9%) (p = 0.084, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.274, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.058-1.032). For a tumor located < 5cm from the anal verge, distant metastasis in preoperative CRT (18.9%) was lower than in postoperative CRT (34.4%) (p = 0.061, HR = 0.444, 95% CI = 0.188-1.047), and 5-year disease-free survival rates in preoperative and postoperative CRT were 72.0 and 59.0%, respectively (p = 0.078). Conclusions: Our findings suggest that preoperative CRT might be appropriate in rectal cancer involving the limited circumferential lumen and located in the low rectum. However, further prospective studies are required.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.