Robustness of Judicial Decisions to Valuation-Method Innovation: An Exploratory Empirical Study
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chen, Feng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yee, Kenton K. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yoo, Yong Keun | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-07T23:12:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-07T23:12:39Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-11 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0306-686X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/115415 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In shareholder litigation, judges and litigants choose from a menu of valuation methods that is evolving over time. What drives demand for new valuation methods? Does valuation method choice affect a judge's final appraisal? Is a judge more likely to favor the litigant whose valuation method coincides with the judge's if the other litigant uses a different method? Using a comprehensive hand-collected sample of Delaware appraisal remedy shareholder litigation cases, we show that the distribution of judicial appraisal outcomes is insensitive to valuation methodology. Moreover, valuation method agreement between judge and plaintiff (or between judge and defendant) does not influence the judge's appraisal. In this sense, judicial valuation is robust to innovations in valuation technology. However, we find that judicial valuation method choice is contextual. The method a judge chooses depends on the fundamental attributes of the firm as well as the quality of litigants' proposed valuation estimates. We conclude that judges demand new valuation methods when the new methods are contextually more appropriate. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | WILEY-BLACKWELL | - |
dc.subject | CORPORATE-LAW | - |
dc.subject | EARNINGS | - |
dc.subject | FINANCE | - |
dc.subject | APPRAISAL | - |
dc.subject | ECONOMY | - |
dc.subject | FIRMS | - |
dc.subject | RULE | - |
dc.title | Robustness of Judicial Decisions to Valuation-Method Innovation: An Exploratory Empirical Study | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yoo, Yong Keun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1468-5957.2010.02193.x | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-78650442276 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000285767300003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING, v.37, no.9-10, pp.1094 - 1114 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF BUSINESS FINANCE & ACCOUNTING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 37 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9-10 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1094 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 1114 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ahci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Business, Finance | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CORPORATE-LAW | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | EARNINGS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FINANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | APPRAISAL | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ECONOMY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FIRMS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RULE | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | judicial valuation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | shareholder litigation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | law and finance | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.