Compromising prioritization from pairwise comparisons considering type I and II errors
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Deok-Hwan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Kwang-Jae | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, K. Sam | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-08T01:30:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-08T01:30:17Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-07-16 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0377-2217 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/116051 | - |
dc.description.abstract | We explore an important problem in prioritizing product design alternatives, using a real-world case. Despite the importance of prioritization in the area of new product development, the development of systematic schemes has been limited and the concepts and methods developed in the decision analysis area do not seem to he used actively. Therefore, we propose a new method, referred to as the compromising prioritization technique, to prioritize the product design alternatives based on paired comparisons. It introduces type I and type II errors and compromises these two errors to arrive at a desirable order of alternatives. To accomplish this, the two indices of homogeneity and separation are developed together with a heuristic algorithm. A comparative study is also conducted to support our method for use in product development and analogous areas. We then demonstrate how to use the developed compromising prioritization technique using a case study on the asymmetric digital subscriber line (ADSL)-based high-speed internet service product. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV | - |
dc.subject | PAIRED COMPARISONS | - |
dc.subject | DECISION-MAKING | - |
dc.subject | PREFERENCE | - |
dc.subject | PROMETHEE | - |
dc.subject | RANKING | - |
dc.subject | UNCERTAINTY | - |
dc.subject | MATRICES | - |
dc.subject | WEIGHTS | - |
dc.subject | MODELS | - |
dc.title | Compromising prioritization from pairwise comparisons considering type I and II errors | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, K. Sam | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ejor.2009.10.008 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-71649090131 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000274094100012 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, v.204, no.2, pp.285 - 293 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.title | EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH | - |
dc.citation.volume | 204 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 285 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 293 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Operations Research & Management Science | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Management | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Operations Research & Management Science | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PAIRED COMPARISONS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DECISION-MAKING | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PREFERENCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PROMETHEE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | RANKING | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | UNCERTAINTY | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MATRICES | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | WEIGHTS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODELS | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Prioritization | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Type I and II errors | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Pairwise comparisons | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Product design and development | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.