A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jaewook | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kang, Suk-Ho | - |
dc.contributor.author | Rosenberger, Jay | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Seoung Bum | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-08T04:01:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-08T04:01:06Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-11 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0360-8352 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/116662 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Because weapon systems are perceived as crucial in determining the outcome of a war, selecting weapon systems is a critical task for nations. Just as with other forms of decision analysis involving multiple criteria, selecting a weapon system poses complex, unstructured problems with a huge number of points that must be considered. Some defense analysts have committed themselves to developing efficient methodologies to solve weapon systems selection problems for the Republic of Korea's (ROK) Armed Forces. In the present study, we propose a hybrid approach for weapon systems selection that combines analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and principal component analysis (PCA) to determine the weights to assign to the factors that go into these selection decisions. These weights are inputted into a goal programming (GP) model to determine the best alternative among the weapon systems. The proposed hybrid approach that combines AHP, PCA and GP process components offsets the shortcomings posed by obscurity and arbitrariness in AHP and therefore can provide decision makers with more reasonable and realistic decision criteria than AHP alone. A case study on weapon system selection for the air force demonstrates the usefulness and effectiveness of the proposed hybrid AHP PCA GP approach. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | - |
dc.subject | ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS | - |
dc.subject | AHP | - |
dc.subject | MODEL | - |
dc.title | A hybrid approach of goal programming for weapon systems selection | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Seoung Bum | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cie.2009.11.013 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-77949489582 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000276920300019 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, v.58, no.3, pp.521 - 527 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING | - |
dc.citation.title | COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 58 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 521 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 527 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Computer Science | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Computer Science, Interdisciplinary Applications | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Industrial | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | AHP | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | MODEL | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Multiple criteria decision analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Analytic hierarchy process | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Goal programming | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Principal component analysis | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Weapon systems | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.