UNCITRAL의 최근 동향 : 1976년 UNCITRAL 중재규칙 개정안의 제3회독을 중심으로
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 강병근 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-08T06:48:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-08T06:48:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-3699 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/117477 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In 2006, the UNCITRAL Working Group II started a new project on the revision of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 1976. Ever since that time, 9 sessions of the Working Group II were devoted to the discussions on such topic. The Arbitration Rules has been acknowledged to be used for settling international disputes involving various disputing parties. In recent years, many treaty-based arbitrations have been subject to the Arbitration Rules. This article focuses on the discussions made in the 52nd session of the Working Group II where the third reading of the revised draft of the Arbitration Rules was completed except for a few provisions. Among the draft rules, the delegations were hardly able to reach an agreement with regard to Articles 2(2), 34(2), 41(3), (4), and (6). It is expected that those provisions would be agreed in the coming 43rd plenary session of the UNCITRAL. The use of the Arbitration Rules is dependent on the agreement by the disputing parties. It is not like the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration which was adopted in Korean legal system in 1999. However, the proper unctioning of arbitration rules is essential for the efficient and successful operation of the arbitration system in a particular country. That is the reason why we should keep close attention on the discussions of the UNCITRAL with regard to the revision of the Arbitration Rules. | - |
dc.format.extent | 24 | - |
dc.language | 한국어 | - |
dc.language.iso | KOR | - |
dc.publisher | 한국중재학회 | - |
dc.title | UNCITRAL의 최근 동향 : 1976년 UNCITRAL 중재규칙 개정안의 제3회독을 중심으로 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Recent Developments : The Third Reading of the Revised Version of the UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules of 1976 | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.publisher.location | 대한민국 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.16998/jas.2010.20.2.3 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 중재연구, v.20, no.2, pp 3 - 26 | - |
dc.citation.title | 중재연구 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 3 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 26 | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001467767 | - |
dc.description.isOpenAccess | N | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 통지 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 면책 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 감정인 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 중재판정 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 중재비용 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | communication | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | exemption from liability | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | expert | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | arbitral award | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cost of arbitration | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
145 Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, 02841, Korea+82-2-3290-2963
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.