Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

The Myth of an Oral Style in Chaucer’s PoetryThe Myth of an Oral Style in Chaucer’s Poetry

Other Titles
The Myth of an Oral Style in Chaucer’s Poetry
Authors
Michael Foster
Issue Date
2010
Publisher
한국중세근세영문학회
Keywords
Geoffrey Chaucer; Orality; Oral Residue; Structuralism; Book of the Duchess; House of Fame; Troilus and Criseyde; The Canterbury Tales
Citation
중세르네상스영문학, v.18, no.2, pp.341 - 360
Indexed
KCI
Journal Title
중세르네상스영문학
Volume
18
Number
2
Start Page
341
End Page
360
URI
https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/117905
DOI
10.17054/memes.2010.18.2.341
ISSN
1229-0394
Abstract
Geoffrey Chaucer is generally recognized as a specifically literary author; he is called the “father of English poetry” and seen as the first of the holy trinity of English literature, comprised also of William Shakespeare and John Milton. However, Chaucer (like Shakespeare) wrote his poetry not for literary readers, but for oral performance in front of a hearing audience. This historical fact, although acknowledged, has been largely ignored in studies of Chaucer’s style, which is seen as containing a type of oral residue or as an affectation of speech as Chaucer ambitiously looks forward to a future of readers silently reading his poetry. In this article I argue that, since all of Chaucer’s works were written for hearing audiences, it is anachronistic to assume that he made any distinction whatsoever between the reading and hearing of his literary works, and that his style is best understood as a versatile adaptation of language to suit both silent and vocalized readings of his texts.
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of English Language and Literature > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE