Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Glomeruloid peritoneal implants in ovarian serous borderline tumours - distinction between invasive and non-invasive implants and pathogenesis

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorLee, Eung-Seok-
dc.contributor.authorLeong, Anthony S-Y-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Insun S.-
dc.contributor.authorKim, Young-Sik-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Ju-Han-
dc.contributor.authorCho, Hyun-Yee-
dc.date.accessioned2021-09-08T11:54:58Z-
dc.date.available2021-09-08T11:54:58Z-
dc.date.created2021-06-11-
dc.date.issued2009-11-
dc.identifier.issn0309-0167-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/118975-
dc.description.abstractAims: To determine whether or not the glomeruloid implants (GI) composed of papillary cores within clear spaces lined by mesothelial cells or tumour cells located in superficial or deep peritoneal tissue in ovarian serous borderline tumours (SBTs) are invasive. Methods and results: We examined the differences in incidence, histological and immunohistochemical findings among three groups: 100 GI with mesothelial cells lining clear space (type I), 100 GI with tumour cells lining clear space (type II), and 100 invasive implants with clefts but no lining cells from 30 cases of SBT with peritoneal implants. The type I lesion had characteristics of non-invasive implants with a tendency for smooth contours (100/100), superficial location (71/100), absence of desmoplasia (100/100) and absence of surrounding destructive invasion (100/100), In contrast, type II GI had irregular contours (67/100), deep location (93/100), presence of desmoplastic reaction (100/100) and presence of destructive invasion (12/100). Immunohistological studies suggested intermediate forms between the two types of lesions. Conclusions: Type I GI are non-invasive implants, whereas type II GI are invasive implants and it is important to evaluate the presence and nature of cells lining the clear space in determining whether implants associated with ovarian SBTs are invasive or not.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherWILEY-
dc.subjectMICROPAPILLARY-
dc.titleGlomeruloid peritoneal implants in ovarian serous borderline tumours - distinction between invasive and non-invasive implants and pathogenesis-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Eung-Seok-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Young-Sik-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorLee, Ju-Han-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03409.x-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-71049132228-
dc.identifier.wosid000271466800002-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationHISTOPATHOLOGY, v.55, no.5, pp.505 - 513-
dc.relation.isPartOfHISTOPATHOLOGY-
dc.citation.titleHISTOPATHOLOGY-
dc.citation.volume55-
dc.citation.number5-
dc.citation.startPage505-
dc.citation.endPage513-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscie-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaCell Biology-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaPathology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryCell Biology-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPathology-
dc.subject.keywordPlusMICROPAPILLARY-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorglomeruloid implants-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorovarian serous borderline tumours-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorperitoneal implants-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Medicine > Department of Medical Science > 1. Journal Articles
Graduate School > Department of Biomedical Sciences > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Kim, Young Sik photo

Kim, Young Sik
의과학과
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE