미국 회사법상 이사의 감시의무 - 대관 2008. 9. 11. 2006 다 68636의 평석을 겸하여 -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김정호 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-08T22:55:24Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-08T22:55:24Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1229-3261 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/121398 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In recent days, the corporate lawyers in U. S. face after the stream of financial crisis and bancruptcy filing of GM and Chrysler a hot discussion on the corporate director's duty of oversight. The Delaware Chancery Court released February of this year two important cases regarding the corporate directors’ duty of oversight, namely the AIG case and the Citigroup case. The Delaware Chancery Court distinguished the latter case from the former. The Corporate Directors' Duty of oversight belongs to a fiduciary duty, namely to the duty of care. The Delaware Law distinguished between ill-advised or negligent board decision and unconsidered board inaction, namely between conduct consitituting (1) " a board decision that results in a loss because that decision was ill-advised or negligent" and (2) "an unconsidered failure of the board to act in circumstances in which due attention would, arguably, have prevented the loss." The above mentioned and commented case of Korean Supreme Court (2006 Da 68636) emphasizes, as in the cases of the Delaware Chancery and Supreme Court, the 'duty to establish a information and report system' in a korean public company. If the directors perform this duty with completion, a plaintiff shareholder can hardly win a ‘Caremark-Claim’ litigation in any Korean Court as in the U.S. and Japan. It is characteristic that the convergence in corporate governance prevails nowadays worldwide. We can watch such a phenomenon especially in the director's fiduciary duty of a public company in U.S., Japan and Korea. Regarding the fiduciary duty of corporate directors and officers, a unified case law seems almost already to be established. Following this streams, the Korean Court should develop a sophisticated case law for the director's the duty of oversight in a public business organization. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 한국경영법률학회 | - |
dc.title | 미국 회사법상 이사의 감시의무 - 대관 2008. 9. 11. 2006 다 68636의 평석을 겸하여 - | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Corporate Director’s Duty of Oversight in American Corporate Law - Simultaneously commenting the Case of Korean Supreme Court, 2006 Da 68636, Sentenced on September 11, 2008 - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김정호 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 경영법률, v.20, no.1, pp.273 - 309 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 경영법률 | - |
dc.citation.title | 경영법률 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 20 | - |
dc.citation.number | 1 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 273 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 309 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001389195 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | corporate director&apos | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | s duty of oversight | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | a right to rely | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | duty to establish a information and report system | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | arning signal | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | “red flags” | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | ‘Caremark’ duty | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | corporate director&apos | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | s duty of good faith | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 이사의 감시의무 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 신뢰권 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 정보 및 보고시스템 구축의무 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 경보신호 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 케어막 듀티 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 이사의 선의의무 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.