1910~1920년대 전반기 안확의 ‘개조론’과 조선 문화 연구An Hwak’s ‘Argument of Reconstruction’ in the 1910s and early 1920s, and his studies of the Joseon culture
- Other Titles
- An Hwak’s ‘Argument of Reconstruction’ in the 1910s and early 1920s, and his studies of the Joseon culture
- Authors
- 류시현
- Issue Date
- 2009
- Keywords
- reconstruction; An Hwak; Cultural history; Korean Studies; Korean identity; 개조; 안확; 문화사; 조선학; 조선적 정체성
- Citation
- 역사문제연구, v.13, no.1, pp.45 - 75
- Indexed
- KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- 역사문제연구
- Volume
- 13
- Number
- 1
- Start Page
- 45
- End Page
- 75
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/121709
- ISSN
- 1226-4199
- Abstract
- An Hwak(1886~1946) served a pioneering role in the area of historical and methodical studies of Korean culture, by authoring ‘Joseon’s art’ and ‘Joseon’s literature’ in the latter half of the 1910s. And in the wake of all the discussions regarding the ‘Reconstruction’ of the early 1920s, he announced 『Argument of Reconstruction』, and participated in social movements as a staff member of the Joseon Youth Association. Later he concentrated upon authoring 『History of Joseon Literature』, 『History of the Joseon Civilization』, all studies related to the Joseon culture. An Hwak’s position in 『Argument of Reconstruction』, is between his own Joseon studies he announced through 『Hakji-Gwang』 in the mid-1910s, and his studies of the Joseon culture he announced in 1922 and 1923.
An Hwak’s studies in those two periods maintained consistency, in terms of maintaining the cause of securing understanding of both the Western things and Joseon things, and also in terms of being a response to the foreigners’ and especially the Japanese scholars’ study of the Joseon culture. Yet crossing the ‘Reconstruction’ period, An Hwak’s Joseon studies began to put more emphasis upon the cultural activities of the ‘ordinary people’, and he started to add the value of ‘righteousness and humanity’ to the existing theme of ‘national quality of the Joseon people’, as well.
His studies of the Joseon culture also proceeded from a civilization-comparative point of view. He argued the uniqueness and superiority of the Joseon culture, and his methodology that led him to that conclusion was similar to those of other contemporary cultural historians. Yet the object of comparison in his case was not the Eastern world, but instead the Greek culture and also the Western modern civilization. With this ‘universal’ moral values, and his own emphasis upon ‘righteousness and humanity’, he was able to set himself apart from other nationalist historians and their overly strong sentiment of nationalism.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - Associate Research Center > Research Institute of Korean Studies > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.