절차적 적법절차의 적용방법
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 윤영미 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-09-09T17:31:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-09-09T17:31:20Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-06-17 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-6159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/125835 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Procedural due process guarantees fair procedures when government deprives an individual of life, liberty or property. Generally and essentially, procedural due process requires that a meaningful opportunity to be heard must be afforded to the individual. Procedural due process plays a role in preventing arbitrary or unilateral deprivations of liberty or property through this requirement. However, the Supreme Court of U.S.A. applies a flexible procedural due process standard whereby balancing test is employed on a case-by-case basis to determine what particular process is due in a given situation. Constitutional Court of Korea also applies a similar flexible balancing test. A predetermination process is important, but it is not regarded necessary in some cases. Although this balancing test enables fair and inexpensive procedural protections of wide range of interests, the problem of uncertainty and disparity that is accompanied in the course of application is yet to be solved. The Constitutional Court needs to give more structure to the balancing test and clarify the relationships between procedural due process and other constitutional protections. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 안암법학회 | - |
dc.title | 절차적 적법절차의 적용방법 | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Procedures Required by Procedural Due Process | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 윤영미 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 안암법학, v.통, no.25, pp.99 - 124 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.volume | 통 | - |
dc.citation.number | 25 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 99 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 124 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001203402 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | other | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 절차적 적법절차 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 고지 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 청문 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 형량심사 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | procedural due process | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | notice | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | hearing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | balancing test | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | procedural due process | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | notice | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | hearing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | balancing test | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.