Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Political Institutions and Coups in Dictatorships

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorSudduth, Jun Koga-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-16T20:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-16T20:40:17Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-30-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.issn0010-4140-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/127672-
dc.description.abstractDoes the creation of nominally democratic institutions help dictators stay in power by diminishing the risk of coups? We posit that the effectiveness of political institutions in deterring coups crucially depends on the types of plotters and their political goals. By providing a means to address the ruling coalition's primary concerns about a dictator's opportunism or incompetence, institutions reduce the necessity of reshuffling coups, in which the ruling coalition replaces an incumbent leader but keeps the regime intact. However, such institutions do not diminish the risk of regime-changing coups, because the plotters' goals of overthrowing the entire regime and changing the group of ruling coalition are not achievable via activities within the institutions. Our empirical analysis provides strong empirical support for our expectations. Our findings highlight that the role of "democratic" institutions in deterring coups is rather limited as it only applies to less than 38% of coup attempts.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC-
dc.subjectCOMMITMENT-
dc.subjectREGIME-
dc.titlePolitical Institutions and Coups in Dictatorships-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0010414021997161-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85101937663-
dc.identifier.wosid000627511300001-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationCOMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES, v.54, no.9, pp.1597 - 1628-
dc.relation.isPartOfCOMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES-
dc.citation.titleCOMPARATIVE POLITICAL STUDIES-
dc.citation.volume54-
dc.citation.number9-
dc.citation.startPage1597-
dc.citation.endPage1628-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGovernment & Law-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPolitical Science-
dc.subject.keywordPlusCOMMITMENT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusREGIME-
dc.subject.keywordAuthornon-democratic regimes-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorinstitutionalized authoritarianism-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcoup d&amp-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor#8217-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoretat-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorleader survival-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorregime transition-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE