Comparative Study on Estimation Methods of Dynamic Resistance Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sang Yeob | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Jong-Sub | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Dong-Ju | - |
dc.contributor.author | Byun, Yong-Hoon | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-20T17:40:44Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-20T17:40:44Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-30 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1424-8220 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/128140 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Dynamic resistance, which can be used to express strength in the unit of stress and improve the reliability of the dynamic cone penetration test (DCPT), has been estimated by numerous methods. This study aims to compare different dynamic resistance estimation methods by using an instrumented dynamic cone penetrometer (IDCP). DCPTs are conducted using a standard dynamic cone penetrometer (DCP) and IDCP in the laboratory and field. Dynamic responses are obtained from the strain gauges and an accelerometer installed at the cone tip of the IDCP. The test results show that dynamic resistance is more efficient in distinguishing profiles than the dynamic cone penetration index. Among the methods to estimate the dynamic resistance at the cone tip, the force-velocity integration method and force integration method are more related to the conventional dynamic resistance considering the potential energy of the hammer than the force squared integration method. Additionally, the dynamic resistance estimated for a longer time period is more reliable, particularly for small driving rod lengths. Regarding the limitation of the dynamic response from an accelerometer in a previous study, the force-based dynamic resistance estimated for a longer time period can be used as the most reliable approach for further soil strength characterization. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | MDPI | - |
dc.subject | PENETRATION RESISTANCE | - |
dc.subject | STRENGTH | - |
dc.subject | STIFFNESS | - |
dc.subject | DCP | - |
dc.title | Comparative Study on Estimation Methods of Dynamic Resistance Using Dynamic Cone Penetrometer | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Lee, Jong-Sub | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/s21093085 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85104892951 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000650786600001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | SENSORS, v.21, no.9 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | SENSORS | - |
dc.citation.title | SENSORS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 21 | - |
dc.citation.number | 9 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Chemistry | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Instruments & Instrumentation | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Chemistry, Analytical | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Electrical & Electronic | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Instruments & Instrumentation | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PENETRATION RESISTANCE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STRENGTH | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | STIFFNESS | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | DCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | DCP | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dynamic penetration | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | dynamic resistance | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | integration method | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | transferred energy | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.