Non-identifiability and testability of missing mechanisms in incomplete two-way contingency tables
- Authors
- Park, Yousung; Oh, Seung Mo; Kwon, Tae Yeon
- Issue Date
- 5월-2021
- Publisher
- KOREAN STATISTICAL SOC
- Keywords
- MNAR; MCAR; identifiability; obseved likelihood; boundary proximity
- Citation
- COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS, v.28, no.3, pp.307 - 314
- Indexed
- SCOPUS
KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- COMMUNICATIONS FOR STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS AND METHODS
- Volume
- 28
- Number
- 3
- Start Page
- 307
- End Page
- 314
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/128190
- DOI
- 10.29220/CSAM.2021.28.3.307
- ISSN
- 2287-7843
- Abstract
- We showed that any missing mechanism is reproduced by EMAR or MNAR with equal fit for observed likelihood if there are non-negative solutions of maximum likelihood equations. This is a generalization of Molen-berghs et al. (2008) and Jeon et al. (2019). Nonetheless, as MCAR becomes a nested model of MNAR, a natural question is whether or not MNAR and MCAR are testable by using the well-known three statistics, LR (Likelihood ratio), Wald, and Score test statistics. Through simulation studies, we compared these three statistics. We investigated to what extent the boundary solution affect tesing MCAR against MNAR, which is the only testable pair of missing mechanisms based on observed likelihood. We showed that all three statistics are useful as long as the boundary proximity is far from 1.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Statistics > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.