Modified check loss for efficient estimation via model selection in quantile regression
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Yoonsuh | - |
dc.contributor.author | MacEachern, Steven N. | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Hang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-21T17:41:19Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-21T17:41:19Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-30 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0266-4763 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/128262 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The check loss function is used to define quantile regression. In cross-validation, it is also employed as a validation function when the true distribution is unknown. However, our empirical study indicates that validation with the check loss often leads to overfitting the data. In this work, we suggest a modified or L2-adjusted check loss which rounds the sharp corner in the middle of check loss. This has the effect of guarding against overfitting to some extent. The adjustment is devised to shrink to zero as sample size grows. Through various simulation settings of linear and nonlinear regressions, the improvement due to modification of the check loss by quadratic adjustment is examined empirically. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | - |
dc.subject | NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject | VARIABLE SELECTION | - |
dc.subject | CROSS-VALIDATION | - |
dc.title | Modified check loss for efficient estimation via model selection in quantile regression | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Jung, Yoonsuh | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/02664763.2020.1753023 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85083665088 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000527178900001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS, v.48, no.5, pp.866 - 886 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF APPLIED STATISTICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 48 | - |
dc.citation.number | 5 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 866 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 886 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Mathematics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Statistics & Probability | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NONPARAMETRIC REGRESSION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | VARIABLE SELECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | CROSS-VALIDATION | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Check loss | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | cross-validation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | quantile regression | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | quantile regression spline | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | quantile smoothing spline | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.