Accelerated Versus Non-accelerated Rehabilitation After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jae Gyoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Won Seok | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Sang-Gyun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Dae Hee | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-22T10:40:54Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-22T10:40:54Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-30 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0019-5413 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/128346 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes between accelerated rehabilitation (AR) and non-accelerated rehabilitation (NR) after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using hamstring autografts through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods To compare the outcomes between AR and NR, we searched Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing their clinical outcomes after ACLR using hamstring autografts were included. AR was characterized by the starting range of motion and weight-bearing within 3 days and return to sports within 6-9 months. A meta-analysis of clinical outcome parameters used in >= 3 studies was conducted. Results Seven studies were included. The International Knee Documentation Committee subjective score was significantly higher in AR than in NR at the 3- (mean difference [MD], 7.30; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.55-13.05; P = 0.013) and 6-month follow-ups (MD, 5.64; 95% CI 0.11-11.17; P = 0.046). The side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation at the final follow-up assessed in four studies was significantly lower in NR than in AR (MD, 0.59; 95% CI 0.12-1.07; P = 0.015). Overall Tunnel widening at the final follow-up assessed in four studies was also smaller in NR than in AR (MD, 0.48; 95% CI 0.00-0.96; P = 0.0479). However, the mean side-to-side difference and overall tunnel widening between them was < 1 mm. Conclusion The early subjective clinical outcomes of AR after ACLR using hamstring autografts were superior to those of NR. Although tunnel widening and anterior instability were also significantly larger in AR than in NR, the difference was not clinically relevant. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER HEIDELBERG | - |
dc.title | Accelerated Versus Non-accelerated Rehabilitation After Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Kim, Jae Gyoon | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s43465-021-00375-9 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85101019985 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000618574700002 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, v.55, no.2, pp.405 - 415 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS | - |
dc.citation.title | INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS | - |
dc.citation.volume | 55 | - |
dc.citation.number | 2 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 405 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 415 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Review | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Orthopedics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Orthopedics | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Knee | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Hamstring | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Accelerated rehabilitation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Meta-analysis | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.