유엔 국제법위원회 “국제관습법의 식별” 제2회독 초안(2018)과 국내문헌 관련 내용 비교분석
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박기갑 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-14T19:41:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-14T19:41:34Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-7880 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/131556 | - |
dc.description.abstract | At its 70th session(2018), the UN International Law Commission(ILC) adopted the entire set of draft conclusions on “Identification of customary international law” on 2nd reading and the commentaries thereto. The Commission submitted the draft conclusions to the UN General Assembly and completed its works. The 2nd reading consists of 16 draft conclusions divided into seven parts. The author considers that some of them need more detailed and critical analysis. This article is divided into five parts including Introduction and Conclusion. The two main bodies, namely Chapter Two and Three deal with the general features of the 2nd reading Conclusions. The Chapter Four discusses in detail about four important legal aspects, namely 1) the contribution of the practice of international organizations to the formation of customary international law, 2) whether and to what extent silence or inaction affects the formation of customary international law, 3) the effect of ILC’s official recognition of “persistent objector rules or doctrines”, finally 4) special customary international law on which the ILC opened up the possibility of the creation of new rules between countries with the same interests along with the development of global networking, such as SNS, as well as the existing theory of the formation of regional customs based on geographic proximity. These above-mentioned four legal aspects or approaches that are adopted by the ILC would have significant impacts on the formation of customary international law in the 21st century. In this regards, it might be necessary and important that the Korean scholars of international law and practitioners should discuss on these points and have a common understanding to enhance the capacity to resolve and respond to any relevant issues of international relations | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 국제법평론회 | - |
dc.title | 유엔 국제법위원회 “국제관습법의 식별” 제2회독 초안(2018)과 국내문헌 관련 내용 비교분석 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Comparative Study between Korean Textbooks and Articles related to Customary International Law and the ILC’s 2nd reading Conclusions on “Identification of Customary International Law”(2018) | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박기갑 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 국제법평론, no.54, pp.47 - 78 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 국제법평론 | - |
dc.citation.title | 국제법평론 | - |
dc.citation.number | 54 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 47 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 78 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART002519234 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | UN International Law Commission | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Customary International Law | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Resolution of International Organizations | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Inaction | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Persistent Objector | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Special Customary International Law | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 유엔 국제법위원회 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 국제관습법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 국제기구의 결의 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 국가의 무대응 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 집요한 반대자 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 특별 국제관습법 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.