The geography of US auditors: information quality and monitoring costs by local versus non-local auditors
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jensen, Kevan | - |
dc.contributor.author | Kim, Jin-Mo | - |
dc.contributor.author | Yi, Han | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-24T11:40:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-24T11:40:32Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-30 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-04 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0924-865X | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/132761 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Borrowing from recent finance research that describes geographic distance as a determinant of information asymmetry and performance, we examine the relation between audit quality and auditor-client proximity. After controlling for monitoring costs (audit fees) and client firms' selection of auditors, we find that accruals quality (a common proxy for audit performance) improves with auditor proximity. The findings indicate that auditors have information advantage that dissipates with geographic distance (i. e., "soft'' information in Berger et al. in J Financ Econ 76(2): 237-269, 2005; Coval and Moskowitz in J Polit Econ 109(4): 811-841, 2001; Petersen and Rajan in J Financ 57(6): 2533-2570, 2002), suggesting that that investors, analysts, and regulators should pay additional attention to information risk for firms audited by non-local auditors. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | SPRINGER | - |
dc.title | The geography of US auditors: information quality and monitoring costs by local versus non-local auditors | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Yi, Han | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s11156-013-0416-2 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-84886959373 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000210775800006 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING, v.44, no.3, pp.513 - 549 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING | - |
dc.citation.title | REVIEW OF QUANTITATIVE FINANCE AND ACCOUNTING | - |
dc.citation.volume | 44 | - |
dc.citation.number | 3 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 513 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 549 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Business & Economics | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Business, Finance | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Information asymmetry | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Monitoring costs | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Monitoring quality | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Geography | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Audit fees | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Audit quality | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.