Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

임금피크제와 취업규칙 변경절차에 관한 법적 검토 - 취업규칙 불이익 변경 관련 정부 입장의 비판적 검토를 중심으로 -

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박종희-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-24T21:40:37Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-24T21:40:37Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-31-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.issn2005-4645-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/132818-
dc.description.abstractThe government prepares for guideline about procedure for amending the rules of employment which in order to settle mandatory retirement of age-sixty. In government’s position, the introduction of a wage peak system for mandatory retirement of age-sixty is unfavorable amending of the rules of employment but under certain conditions, it can admit that reasonableness of social convention. Although the regulation about mandatory retirement of age-sixty is compulsory provisions, it is to be interpreted declaratively because the obligations to reform the wage system can not be forced. Also the reformation of the wage system and the mandatory retirement of age-sixty are not relevant. Therefore the introduction of reducing wage peak system should be unfavorable amending of the rules of employment. In conclusion, government’s guideline of the wage peak system needs to be withdrawn. It is because that the problem of application in mandatory retirement of age-sixty is to be solved according to the labor-management autonomous.-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher노동법이론실무학회-
dc.title임금피크제와 취업규칙 변경절차에 관한 법적 검토 - 취업규칙 불이익 변경 관련 정부 입장의 비판적 검토를 중심으로 --
dc.title.alternativeA legal study on wage peak system and procedure for amending the rules of employment - A critical review of government’s position regarding unfavorable amending of the rules of employment --
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박종희-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation노동법포럼, no.15, pp.25 - 52-
dc.relation.isPartOf노동법포럼-
dc.citation.title노동법포럼-
dc.citation.number15-
dc.citation.startPage25-
dc.citation.endPage52-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART002012984-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthormandatory retirement of age-sixty-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorwage peak system-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorwage adjustment-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorwages system-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorreasonableness of social convention-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcriteria for unfavorable amending of the rules of employment.-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor정년 60세-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor임금피크제-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor임금조정-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor임금체계-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor사회통념상 합리성-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor불이익변경 판단기준-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, Jong Hee photo

PARK, Jong Hee
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE