제3자를 위한 계약의 재검토 − 새로운 형태의 보증을 중심으로 −
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 김명숙 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-27T04:41:00Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-27T04:41:00Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-6159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/133325 | - |
dc.description.abstract | By contract, as a basic institution of legal thought, the parties may arrange that the third party acquires the right to demand the performance directly. It never vests in the promisee, he only may acquire the right to claim that performance be rendered to the third party. By a contract of suretyship the surety puts himself under a duty to the creditor of a third party to be responsible for discharging that third party’s obligation. The contract for the benefit of the third parties has been found on the variety of surrounding pheonomena, especially on the area of suretyship. It is a new type of Surety, but the contract for the benefit of the third parties are of practical importance. In case of insurance such a profit of suretyship ; guaranty insurance policy, insured sum will be paid to the third party on the occurrence of the insured event - non performance of the main debtor. The main function of performance base enrichment is to find a satisfactory solution for multipartite who is performing within contractual relationship involving chain of performance. If any contracts within the chain of performance is imperfect, restitution must occur between adjoining parties in the chain, the rule against leap- frogging is very important. Performance based restitution between three or more parties has become one of the most controversial areas. In case the parties concerned have differing views about has performed toward whom, a contractual approach has a acid test in case of the contract for the benefit of the third parties. The main obstacle is the dogma of privity of contract which creates rights and duties only for and against the parties. The relationships of performance are decisive for the way in which enrichment is returned. On the reasoning, the legal theory of the contract of surety may be applied on the new type of the suretyship. But it is very controversial. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 안암법학회 | - |
dc.title | 제3자를 위한 계약의 재검토 − 새로운 형태의 보증을 중심으로 − | - |
dc.title.alternative | A Review on the Contract for the benefit of third party - the New Type of Contract of Suretyship - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 김명숙 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 안암법학, no.44, pp.317 - 355 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.number | 44 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 317 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 355 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001878634 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | contract for the benefit of third party | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | unjust enrichment | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | contract of suretyship | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | guaranty insurance policy | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | the dogma of privity of contract | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | performance base restitution | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 제3자를 위한 계약 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 부당이득 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 보증 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 보증보험계약 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 당사자관계 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 급부부당이득 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.