중화인민공화국 초기 北京 基層 거버넌스 체제의 구축 ― 도시 街道의 국가와 사회, 1949-1954 ―
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 박상수 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-29T16:41:11Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-29T16:41:11Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-1270 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/133626 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The article examines the process of urban administration building in Beijing in the early PRC to evaluate the status of Neighborhood Residents' Committee(街道居民委員會) in terms of state-society relationship by analysing the concerned materials preserved in Beijing Municipal Archives. The research question is why the CCP established the Residents' Committee and restored the ward government after having abolished the early-intended administrative system of government in ward and neighborhood level. According to the analysis, this vicissitudes in the urban basic level administration was due to the discrepancies between the ideals and the realities: the CCP state's strong intention to expand its power to basic level of society, on one hand, and, on the other, the lack of means to realize the intention. Facing such discrepancies, the CCP paid its attention to “autonomous” residents' organization, which led to the establishment of Residents' Committee in national level in 1954. According to the CCP terminology, the “autonomy”(自治) did not mean self-determination or complete independence from state power, but rather residents' voluntary response to and active participation in the governmental policy execution. The CCP's emphasis upon the residents' autonomy signifies, however, that the CCP power could not infiltrate into society under its early conditions of lacking in capable cadres to administer the urban residents, and thereby appealing to the residents' voluntary cooperation with state. Beyond the conventional “state control” approaches based on the totalitarian model, the author tries to redefine such autonomy given to the Residents' Committee as the Communists' efforts to establish a kind of governance system in which the state leads societal autonomy or societal autonomy functions under the state leadership. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 동양사학회 | - |
dc.title | 중화인민공화국 초기 北京 基層 거버넌스 체제의 구축 ― 도시 街道의 국가와 사회, 1949-1954 ― | - |
dc.title.alternative | Formation of Urban Basic-level Governance System, Beijing, 1949-1954: State and Society in the Neighborhood(街道) Space | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 박상수 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 동양사학연구, no.123, pp.357 - 399 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 동양사학연구 | - |
dc.citation.title | 동양사학연구 | - |
dc.citation.number | 123 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 357 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 399 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001785362 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 국가-사회 관계 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 도시 거버넌스 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 街道居民委員會 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 北京 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 中華人民共和國 초기 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 国家-社会关系 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 城市治理 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 街道居民委员会 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 北京 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 中华人民共和国初期 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | State-society Relationship | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Urban Governance | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Neighborhood Residents&apos | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Committee | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Beijing | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | The Early PRC | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.