Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

Semiotic Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Moral Psychology

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author이승환-
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-29T23:41:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-29T23:41:05Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-31-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.issn1598-267X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/133662-
dc.description.abstractThis paper aims to clarify the theoretic scheme of Zhu Xi's moral psychology from a semiological point of view. According to the author's analysis, Zhu Xi's moral psychology is composed of two different semiotic frames: the horizontal arrangement of li and qi, and the vertical arrangement of li and qi. In Zhu Xi's theoretic scheme, the horizontal frame is applied to describe the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions), while the vertical frame is applied to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). While Toegye, by adopting the horizontal frame, tried to depict the ambivalent relationship between li (i.e. moral dispositions) and qi (i.e. non-moral dispositions); Kobong and Yulgok, by adopting the vertical frame, tried to explain the ontological relationship in which li (i.e. metaphysical principle) supervenes on qi (i.e. constitutive matter). The seeming discord of two semiotic frames made Chosŏn Neo-Confucian scholars split into two antagonistic groups. In this paper, the author, by explicating the two frames that Zhu Xi adopted, tries to lay a cornerstone to understand the reason why Toegye School and Yulgok School couldn't help but fall into never-ending controversy.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisher성균관대학교 유교문화연구소-
dc.titleSemiotic Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Moral Psychology-
dc.title.alternativeSemiotic Analysis of Zhu Xi’s Moral Psychology-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor이승환-
dc.identifier.doi10.22916/jcpc.2013..20.25-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationJournal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture, no.20, pp.25 - 46-
dc.relation.isPartOfJournal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture-
dc.citation.titleJournal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture-
dc.citation.number20-
dc.citation.startPage25-
dc.citation.endPage46-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001797597-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor朱子-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor退溪-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor高峰-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor栗穀-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor橫說-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor豎說-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor框架-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorZhu Xi-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorToegye-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorYulgok-
dc.subject.keywordAuthordisposition-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorfeeling-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoremotion-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorsupervenience-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcovariance-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Liberal Arts > Department of Philosophy > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE