부정청탁방지법안 상 금품 등 수수행위의 직무관련성 - 미국 불법사례수수죄를 중심으로 -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 강수진 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-30T20:41:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-30T20:41:05Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-6159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/133767 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Recently, fierce debates are on the table regarding the 「Bill on the prevention of Unjust Solicitations and Conflicts of Interest」(hereinafter "the Bill") which includes relations with public duty clauses as an element of crime in accepting illegal money, etc. The Bill referred to the Illegal Gratuity Statute of 18 U.S.C 201(c), which includes "for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by such public official" as an intent element. The intent element in illegal gratuity statute has been construed in different ways. The first theory is that its intent means comprehensive relations with the official position itself. The second one is illegal gratuity has to do with specific official act and it should aim at enhancing the possibility of favorable treatment for the provider side. The third analysis is the intent means the mere reward for the specific official act. Korean provision on the accepting illegal money, etc. also needs subjective elements of crime, i.e. relations with public duty clauses considering its gravity in Korean culture and similarity with bribery in its unlawful nature. However, the scope of relations with public duty clauses should be interpreted more broadly than that of illegal gratuity statute in United States because the purpose of legislation in Korea is to stamp out corruption rather than choose illegal gift out of proper lobbyist activity. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 안암법학회 | - |
dc.title | 부정청탁방지법안 상 금품 등 수수행위의 직무관련성 - 미국 불법사례수수죄를 중심으로 - | - |
dc.title.alternative | The Meaning of Relations with Public Duty in the 「Bill on the Prevention of Unjust Solicitations and Conflicts of Interest」- Comparison with Illegal Gratuity Statutes of 18 U.S. Code 201(c) - | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 강수진 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 안암법학, no.42, pp.29 - 54 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.number | 42 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 29 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 54 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001806274 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 부정청탁 및 이해충돌 방지법안(Bill on the Prevention of Unjust Solicitations and Conflicts of Interest) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 직무관련성(Relations with Pulblic Duty) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 불법사례죄(불법사례제공죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 불법사례수수죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Illegal Gratuity) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 대가성(quid pro quo) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 뇌물죄(뇌물수수죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 뇌물공여죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 수뢰죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 증뢰죄 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Bribery) | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.