Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

드워킨의 정치적 신념: 자유, 평등 그리고 생명의 사이

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박경신-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-06T04:40:54Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-06T04:40:54Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-31-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.issn1598-1584-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134565-
dc.description.abstractThis article attempts at politically classifying Dworkin. One's political orientation is often best shown through his or her attitude toward the relationship between liberty and equality. Indeed, Dworkin's such attitude is best shown in his ambitious proposal for the ultimate political morality that each state must be based upon, which dictates that the state should (1) treat all people with equal concern and (2) guarantee that each one's fate is determined by his or her choice alone. These two principles materialize in the radical principle of ‘equality of resources’ whereby everyone is distributed equal resources which are subject to redistribution for all factors other than the person's choices, including personal abilities,and once redistributed, everyone is responsible for all the consequences of his or her use of the resources. However, these principles, when applied to pornography and affirmative action, do not produce binding results. Dworkin's stance on pornography depends on empirical analysis on whether fictions depicting women negatively chill women's actions, and his stance on affirmative action requires a finding on whether people make decisions based on kinship. More generally, the tension between the political left and the political right originates more from such concrete understanding of man whereby the Left insist on a more compassionate understanding of man where even equality of results is sometimes required while the Right insist on an atomistic, self-reliant understanding of man. Dworkin's liberal principle does not correlate to or resolve that dispute. This is actually expected because Dworkin is known more for the Herculean, inductive reasoning than the deductive reasoning. By trying to derive the concrete from the universal, Dworkin has given up drawing from the richest source of his usual legal reasoning: positive law. The author suspects that Dworkin's failure to reconcile liberty and equality originates from the fact that his ostensibly liberal principles are actually based on substantively objective value of life. Confirming that suspicion through speculation will be the topic for another research project.-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher고려대학교 법학연구원-
dc.title드워킨의 정치적 신념: 자유, 평등 그리고 생명의 사이-
dc.title.alternativeDworkin as a Partisan: Between Equality, Liberty and Life-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박경신-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation고려법학, no.57, pp.87 - 126-
dc.relation.isPartOf고려법학-
dc.citation.title고려법학-
dc.citation.number57-
dc.citation.startPage87-
dc.citation.endPage126-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001463427-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorRonald Dworkin-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoraffirmative action-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpornography-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorequality of resources-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorprinciple of equal concern and respect-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor드워킨-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor소수자특례제도-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor포르노그래피-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor자원의 평등-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor동등한 관심과 존중의 원칙-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher Park, Kyung sin photo

Park, Kyung sin
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE