특허 양도인과 실시권자의 부쟁의무에 대한 연구Assignor Estoppel and Licensee Estoppel
- Other Titles
- Assignor Estoppel and Licensee Estoppel
- Authors
- 안효질
- Issue Date
- 2009
- Publisher
- 안암법학회
- Keywords
- 부쟁의무; 부쟁조항; 특허무효심판청구; 이해관계인; 특허실시계약; 라이선시 금반언; 양도인 금반언; 기술이전; no-challenge obligation; no-challenge clause; patent invalidity trial; patent invalidation process; interested parties; patent license agreement; licensee estoppel; assignor estoppel; technology transfer
- Citation
- 안암법학, no.30, pp.345 - 387
- Indexed
- KCI
OTHER
- Journal Title
- 안암법학
- Number
- 30
- Start Page
- 345
- End Page
- 387
- URI
- https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134712
- ISSN
- 1226-6159
- Abstract
- There is a lot of debate both in the inside and outside of Korea about the possibility of invalidity claims made by either the licensee or the assignor of the patent rights. Most controversial are particularly the problems whether including "no-challenge" provision in license agreement is a misuse of the patent right or constitutes an anti-competitive behavior under the antitrust law and whether the licensee or the assignor is, based on the principle of trust and good faith, prohibited from challenging the validity of the licensed or assigned patent, even if there is no such provision. This issue consists fundamentally of conflicts between general principles of the contract law such as the principle of trust and good faith or the principal of estoppel and the purpose of the patent system to promote industrial development. The research will compare and analyze how the laws, judicial precedents and theories of Korea and Japan are implemented, applied and interpreted regarding such conflicts and conclusively will suggest a reasonable standard as to how to deal with these problems.
- Files in This Item
- There are no files associated with this item.
- Appears in
Collections - ETC > 1. Journal Articles
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.