선거규제의 불명확성에 대한 검토 - 공직선거법의 공무원에 대한 중립의무규정들을 중심으로 -
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 윤영미 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-07T12:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-07T12:41:08Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1226-6159 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134727 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There have been criticisms alleging the overbreadth or excessiveness of restrictions on political activities placed by the Public Official Election Act(POEA). The question of vagueness also arose with some terms such as "election campaign" on which POEA impose various limitations. This article looks into vagueness problems of POEA prohibitions against public employees' activities which are not deemed neutral with respect to a public election. Although the National Public Service Law and the Local Public Service Law place restrictions on public employees‘ political activities, specified public officials in political service are excepted from those restrictions. On the other hand, such officials other than members of the National Assembly or local councils are not excepted from many restrictions on political activities in POEA. Prohibited activities include, (1) taking part in an election campaign (section 58(1)); using official authority or influence in connection with an election campaign (section 85(1)); taking part in classified political activities such as "election planning"(section 86(1)). According to the interpretation of the Constitutional Court, section9(1) prohibition against "those activities that affect outcome of an election" also applies to all public employees and officials(but members of the National Assembly or local councils). The Court held that the definition of banned activities in section 9(1) was not unconstitutionally vague, and the same court also held that "the ban on participating in election planning is unconstitutional in so far as he does not use his authority or official influence", in another case. Partisan political activities by government employees must be limited if the Government is to operate effectively, the laws are executed impartially, or elections are to be carried out fairly. However, proscriptions against taking part in political activities have to be more narrowly tailored with respect to group of positions involving authorities or duties of different nature. The definition of banned activities in section 9 (1), among others, is impermissibly vague when the provision is applied to officials in policy- making positions. The problem with such vagueness is that public policy decisions have to be based on transparency, openness and participation. Unclear ban on wide range of activities including expressions on public issues could have undesirable chilling effect on legitimate policy-making process. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 안암법학회 | - |
dc.title | 선거규제의 불명확성에 대한 검토 - 공직선거법의 공무원에 대한 중립의무규정들을 중심으로 - | - |
dc.title.alternative | Vagueness problems in Election Law | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 윤영미 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 안암법학, no.29, pp.1 - 38 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 안암법학 | - |
dc.citation.number | 29 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 1 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 38 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001344709 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | other | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Public Official Election Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | election for public office | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | election campaign | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | freedom of expression | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fairness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | vagueness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | overbreadth | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | public employee | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | public official in political service | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | policy-making | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공직선거법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공직선거 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 선거운동 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 표현의 자유 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공정성 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 불명확성 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 광범성 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 공무원 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 정무직 공무원 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 정책결정 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Public Official Election Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | election for public office | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | election campaign | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | freedom of expression | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | fairness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | vagueness | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | overbreadth | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | public employee | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | public official in political service | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | policy-making | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.