Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

위법한 근로자파견의 법률효과에 관한 법적 쟁점과 평가 - 대법원 2008. 09. 18. 선고 2007두22320 판결을 중심으로 -

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.author박종희-
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-07T20:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-07T20:40:18Z-
dc.date.created2021-08-31-
dc.date.issued2009-
dc.identifier.issn1598-1584-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134768-
dc.description.abstractThere are some legal issues in this decision of supreme court as follow. First, whether the section 6(3)(before repealed) of the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act must be applied to a employment agency work, even if the work is violating the Act. Second, whether, in case of such unlawful agency work, the agency employee can be regarded as a regular employee of the client (namely, the user employer) just at the end of two years like a lawful agency work under the Act. Otherwise, whether the unlawful work should be regarded as a regular employment relations with the client at the beginning of the legal relations Third, whether the client can take into a agency employee' service in changing one employment agency to another employment agency beyond the period of two years provided by the Act. Fourth, whether it can be regarded that the employment relations is directly established between the employee and the client at the beginning of the service, if the employment agency of a agency employee have been changed to another agency in appearance, but the employee is working in same workplace as before. Finally, if the section 6(3)(before repealed) can be applied, then, what is the legal nature of the employment contract between the agency employee and the client? In conclusion, the direct employment relations should be established between the client and the agency employee. Because when a employment agency work is defined as unlawfulness, then, the agency employee can be protected for the purpose of the Act. And it can be allowed that the client make use a agency employee's service beyond the two years period in changing a employment agency for new one, if the Act have the purpose to maintain the job of the employee. Furthermore, the employment contract between the client and the agency employee under the section 6(3)(before repealed) can be regarded as a regular employment without a term. It is a reasonable interpretation for the purpose of the Act and the legal system.-
dc.languageKorean-
dc.language.isoko-
dc.publisher고려대학교 법학연구원-
dc.title위법한 근로자파견의 법률효과에 관한 법적 쟁점과 평가 - 대법원 2008. 09. 18. 선고 2007두22320 판결을 중심으로 --
dc.title.alternativeLegal Issues of Employment Agency Work Against the Employment Agency Worker Protection Act-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor박종희-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation고려법학, no.53, pp.277 - 299-
dc.relation.isPartOf고려법학-
dc.citation.title고려법학-
dc.citation.number53-
dc.citation.startPage277-
dc.citation.endPage299-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.identifier.kciidART001362625-
dc.description.journalClass2-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClasskci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassother-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor근로자파견-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor불법파견-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor파견근로자보호 등에 관한 법률-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor직업안정법-
dc.subject.keywordAuthor연쇄적 근로관계-
dc.subject.keywordAuthoremployment agency work-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorunlawful agency work-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorthe Employment Agency Worker Protection Act-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorJob Security Act-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorconsecutive employment relations-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
ETC > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Related Researcher

Researcher PARK, Jong Hee photo

PARK, Jong Hee
법학전문대학원
Read more

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE