산업안전보건법상 양벌규정에 의한 사업주와 행위자의 처벌
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | 이주원 | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-01-08T12:40:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-01-08T12:40:40Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2021-08-31 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1598-1584 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/134893 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The Korean Industrial Safety and Health Act(“KISHA”, hereinafter), for the purpose of preventing industrial disasters, imposes on business owners the duties to implement various safety and health measures and enforces them through the penalties for non-compliance. In addition, KISHA provides for joint punishment for the business owners. In light of the legislative purpose and the text of the statute, a line of precedents subjugating a non-business-owner actor to the joint punishment is understandable. Also, it is understandable to find the basis for punishing the business owner in its negligence in supervision. However, a line of precedents interpreting the joint punishment provisions as setting up a presumption of negligence and thereby shifting the burden of proving lack of negligence over to the business owner must be reexamined in light of the principle of presumed innocence and in dubio pro reo. If an individual business owner is the perpetrator himself/herself, the basis for jointly punishing the business owner is the criminal liability for his/her own act and is the case for punishing the perpetrator. However, identifying the perpetrator is difficult, and also pursuant to the general principles of criminal law, the perpetrator can be punished only for intentional act not for negligent ones. On the other hand, it is not only very unnatural in terms of legislative phraseology but also legislative non-preparedness under the requirement that the elements of a crime be clear, to allow punishing the non-business-owner perpetrator under the incomplete phrase ‘other than punishing the perpetrator’ when only the business owner is the duty-holder under KISHA. In order to provide joint punishment for a non-duty-holder perpetrator, the joint punishment provisions must specifically state so. | - |
dc.language | Korean | - |
dc.language.iso | ko | - |
dc.publisher | 고려대학교 법학연구원 | - |
dc.title | 산업안전보건법상 양벌규정에 의한 사업주와 행위자의 처벌 | - |
dc.title.alternative | Punishment of Business Owner and Perpetrator under the Joint Punishment Provisions of the Korean Industrial Safety and Health Act | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | 이주원 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | 고려법학, no.51, pp.285 - 325 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | 고려법학 | - |
dc.citation.title | 고려법학 | - |
dc.citation.number | 51 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 285 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 325 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.identifier.kciid | ART001286705 | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 2 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | kci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | other | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Industrial Safety and Health | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Korean Industrial Safety and Health Act | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | business owner | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | perpetrator | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | negligence in supervision | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | The Joint Punishment Provision | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | exemption provision | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 산업안전보건 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 산업안전보건법 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 사업주 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 행위자 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 선임감독상의 과실 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 양벌규정 | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | 면책조항 | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.