Detailed Information

Cited 0 time in webofscience Cited 0 time in scopus
Metadata Downloads

External threat environments and individual bias against female leaders

Full metadata record
DC Field Value Language
dc.contributor.authorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Alice J.-
dc.date.accessioned2022-02-11T12:40:17Z-
dc.date.available2022-02-11T12:40:17Z-
dc.date.created2022-01-19-
dc.date.issued2022-01-
dc.identifier.issn2049-8470-
dc.identifier.urihttps://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/135335-
dc.description.abstractWe argue that a country's international security context influences individual bias against female leaders and propose three mechanisms: by increasing individual demand for defense, by shaping individual ideological orientations, and by increasing society's level of militarization. Using survey data of more than 200,000 individuals in 84 countries, we show the more hostile the country's security environment, the more individuals are likely to agree that men make better political leaders than do women. We also find support for some of our proposed mechanisms and that the effect of security environments is greater for men than women. Our study presents the first cross-national evidence that the country's international security environment correlates with bias against women leaders.-
dc.languageEnglish-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherCAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS-
dc.subjectGENDER STEREOTYPES-
dc.subjectWOMEN-
dc.subjectSUPPORT-
dc.subjectWAR-
dc.subjectATTITUDES-
dc.subjectSECURITY-
dc.subjectDEFENSE-
dc.subjectIMPACT-
dc.subjectSEX-
dc.titleExternal threat environments and individual bias against female leaders-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthorKim, Nam Kyu-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/psrm.2020.54-
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85099480452-
dc.identifier.wosid000731566900003-
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitationPOLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, v.10, no.1, pp.1 - 17-
dc.relation.isPartOfPOLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS-
dc.citation.titlePOLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS-
dc.citation.volume10-
dc.citation.number1-
dc.citation.startPage1-
dc.citation.endPage17-
dc.type.rimsART-
dc.type.docTypeArticle-
dc.description.journalClass1-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassssci-
dc.description.journalRegisteredClassscopus-
dc.relation.journalResearchAreaGovernment & Law-
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategoryPolitical Science-
dc.subject.keywordPlusGENDER STEREOTYPES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWOMEN-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSUPPORT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusWAR-
dc.subject.keywordPlusATTITUDES-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSECURITY-
dc.subject.keywordPlusDEFENSE-
dc.subject.keywordPlusIMPACT-
dc.subject.keywordPlusSEX-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorcomparative politics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorgender and politics-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorinternational security-
dc.subject.keywordAuthorpolitical behavior-
Files in This Item
There are no files associated with this item.
Appears in
Collections
College of Political Science & Economics > Department of Political Science and International Relations > 1. Journal Articles

qrcode

Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

Altmetrics

Total Views & Downloads

BROWSE