Comparison of Imputation Methods for End-User Demands in Water Distribution Systems
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Jun, Sanghoon | - |
dc.contributor.author | Jung, Donghwi | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lansey, Kevin E. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-12T11:40:51Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-12T11:40:51Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-02-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12-01 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0733-9496 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/135496 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This study examines the impact of advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) end-user demand metering failure on water distribution system (WDS) operation and management. To address this issue, our first step is to develop a burst detection algorithm that compares total end-user demands with system inflow rates. Western Electric Company (WEC) rules are applied to test for anomalies in the time series of normalized differences between supply and withdrawal. Then, hydraulic model prediction and burst detection performance are evaluated for fully reporting and missing AMI demand conditions using synthetically generated end-user demands for a network in Tucson, Arizona. Three imputation methods [zero, historical mean (HM), and distribution sampling (DS) method] are applied to replace missing AMI data and are compared for a range of missing data percentages. Based on the numerical experimental results, HM imputation method is the most useful tool to replace missing WDS AMI data. This scheme resulted in the lowest hydraulic model prediction errors and low false-alarm rates while maintaining high burst detection probability. However, more false alarms are raised as the percentage of missing data increases. To solve the problem, the guidelines for optimal WEC rule application are identified for a range of missing demand levels. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS | - |
dc.subject | TIME-SERIES | - |
dc.subject | BURST DETECTION | - |
dc.subject | PIPE BURST | - |
dc.subject | KNOWLEDGE | - |
dc.subject | NETWORK | - |
dc.subject | FLOW | - |
dc.title | Comparison of Imputation Methods for End-User Demands in Water Distribution Systems | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Jung, Donghwi | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001477 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85116072911 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000708122200003 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, v.147, no.12 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.citation.title | JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT | - |
dc.citation.volume | 147 | - |
dc.citation.number | 12 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scie | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Engineering | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Water Resources | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Engineering, Civil | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Water Resources | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | BURST DETECTION | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | FLOW | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | KNOWLEDGE | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | NETWORK | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PIPE BURST | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | TIME-SERIES | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Burst detection | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | End-user&apos | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | s demand | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Imputation | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Missing data | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Water distribution systems (WDS) | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.