Judgments of honest and deceptive communication in art forgery controversies: two field studies testing truth-default theory's projected motive model in Korea
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lee, Si-Ah | - |
dc.contributor.author | Park, Hee Sun | - |
dc.contributor.author | Levine, Timothy R. | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-02-14T19:40:57Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-02-14T19:40:57Z | - |
dc.date.created | 2022-02-08 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-11-02 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0129-2986 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholar.korea.ac.kr/handle/2021.sw.korea/135777 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Two field studies investigated people's inferences about the honesty or deceptiveness of two Korean artists whose work may or may not have been forged. Based on the projective motive model from truth-default theory, it was anticipated that judgments of honesty would be impacted by people's perceptions of the artist's apparent motive for lying. The results of both studies were consistent with the importance of apparent motives. The role of internal attributions was also assessed for veracity judgment. Internal attributions may be more common as explanations for honesty than deception. The data provide additional evidence of the cross-cultural applicability of truth-default theory. | - |
dc.language | English | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.publisher | ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD | - |
dc.subject | PEOPLE | - |
dc.title | Judgments of honest and deceptive communication in art forgery controversies: two field studies testing truth-default theory's projected motive model in Korea | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.contributor.affiliatedAuthor | Park, Hee Sun | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/01292986.2021.1977354 | - |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85114826040 | - |
dc.identifier.wosid | 000695086700001 | - |
dc.identifier.bibliographicCitation | ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION, v.31, no.6, pp.536 - 549 | - |
dc.relation.isPartOf | ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION | - |
dc.citation.title | ASIAN JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION | - |
dc.citation.volume | 31 | - |
dc.citation.number | 6 | - |
dc.citation.startPage | 536 | - |
dc.citation.endPage | 549 | - |
dc.type.rims | ART | - |
dc.type.docType | Article | - |
dc.description.journalClass | 1 | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | ssci | - |
dc.description.journalRegisteredClass | scopus | - |
dc.relation.journalResearchArea | Communication | - |
dc.relation.journalWebOfScienceCategory | Communication | - |
dc.subject.keywordPlus | PEOPLE | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | Lies | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | attributions | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | communication | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | deception | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | forgery | - |
dc.subject.keywordAuthor | truth-default theory | - |
Items in ScholarWorks are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
(02841) 서울특별시 성북구 안암로 14502-3290-1114
COPYRIGHT © 2021 Korea University. All Rights Reserved.
Certain data included herein are derived from the © Web of Science of Clarivate Analytics. All rights reserved.
You may not copy or re-distribute this material in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Clarivate Analytics.